Conviction of NYC cop cannibalism case overturned


NEW YORK (AP) — A federal judge has overturned the conviction of a former New York City police officer
accused of plotting to kidnap, kill and eat young women.
Judge Paul Gardephe ruled late Monday that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of
Gilberto Valle, the New York Times reported. Valle, who could have faced life in prison, was acquitted
of kidnapping conspiracy charges, the most serious count he faced.
He was convicted in March 2013 and had not yet been sentenced.
A jury concluded he wasn’t just fantasizing when he conversed online with others he had never met about
killing and cooking his wife and others in a cannibalism plot.
“The evidentiary record is such that it is more likely than not the case that all of Valle’s Internet
communications about kidnapping are fantasy role-play,” Gardephe said in his 118-page opinion.
The judge planned a hearing Tuesday on the status of case; Valle has been in jailed since his arrest in
Prosecutors had argued Valle took steps to carry out his plot, including looking up potential targets on
a restricted law enforcement database; searching the Internet for how to knock someone out with
chloroform and where to get torture devices and other tools.
Gardephe upheld Valle’s conviction on a charge of illegally gaining access to the law enforcement
database, which carried a maximum sentence of one year. Valle was fired after his conviction.
In one of the numerous online conversations shown to the jury during the trial, Valle told a man he met
in a fetish chat room, “I want her to experience being cooked alive. She’ll be trussed up like a turkey.
… She’ll be terrified, screaming and crying.”
In another exchange, Valle suggested a woman he knew would be easy prey because she lived alone. The men
discussed cooking her, basted in olive oil, over an open fire and using her severed head as a
centerpiece for a sit-down meal.
Valle defense lawyer Robert Baum had said that the conviction set “a dangerous precedent.” The larger
principle at stake in the trial was that “people can be prosecuted for their thoughts,” he said.
Valle’s defense attorneys had vowed to appeal the verdict and said they would appeal to Gardephe to throw
out the verdict.
Information from: The New York Times,

No posts to display