UK lawmakers reject government’s Brexit deal

0

LONDON (AP) — U.K. lawmakers on Friday rejected the government’s divorce agreement with the European
Union for a third time, leaving Britain just two weeks to decide between a long delay to Brexit and an
abrupt no-deal departure from the bloc.
The House of Commons voted 286-344 against the withdrawal agreement struck between Prime Minister Theresa
May and the EU, rebuffing her plea to "put aside self and party" and "accept the
responsibility given to us by the British people" to deliver Brexit.
Amid business warnings that a no-deal Brexit could mean crippling tariffs, border gridlock and shortages
of goods, a visibly frustrated May said the vote had "grave" implications.
"The legal default now is that the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union on 12 April —
in just 14 days’ time," she said. "This is not enough time to agree, legislate for and ratify
a deal, and yet the House has been clear it will not permit leaving without a deal. And so we will have
to agree an alternative way forward."
Had the deal been passed, Britain would have left the EU on May 22.
The EU said the rejection of the divorce terms made a no-deal Brexit "a likely scenario" and
called an emergency summit for April 10 to decide what to do next.
An EU Commission official said the 27 remaining EU nations were "fully prepared for a no-deal
scenario at midnight 12th of April" — Britain’s deadline to chart a new course.
Almost three years after Britain voted in June 2016 to leave the EU, and two years after it set its
departure date for March 29, 2019, British politicians remain deadlocked over Brexit. Like the country
as a whole, they are split between those who want a clean break, those who want to retain close ties
with the bloc, and those who want to overturn the decision to leave.
Last week, to prevent Britain from crashing out, granted an extension to May 22 had the divorce deal been
approved by Friday — or to April 12 if rejected.
The 58-vote margin of defeat for the deal Friday was narrower than in previous votes in January and
March, but it still leaves the government’s blueprint for exiting the bloc in tatters.
May’s deal was voted down even after the prime minister sacrificed her job in exchange for Brexit,
promising to quit if lawmakers approved the agreement and let Britain leave the EU on schedule. With the
deal’s rejection, she will face pressure to step aside and let a new Conservative leader take over
negotiations with the EU.
The government had also warned pro-Brexit politicians that rejecting May’s deal could see Brexit delayed
indefinitely.
May’s arguments moved some previously resistant Brexit-backers to support the deal. Former Foreign
Secretary Boris Johnson — a likely contender to replace May as Conservative Party leader — tweeted that
rejecting it risked "being forced to accept an even worse version of Brexit or losing Brexit
altogether."
But the Democratic Unionist Party in Northern Ireland, with 10 seats in the House of Commons, refused to
back the agreement because it treats Northern Ireland differently from the rest of the U.K.
Parliament voted on the legally binding, 585-page withdrawal agreement that May struck with the EU late
last year, setting out the terms of Britain’s departure — but not on a shorter declaration on future
ties that was also part of the accord between the two sides.
Removing the political declaration from the Brexit vote altered the deal enough to overcome a
parliamentary ban against asking lawmakers the same question over and over again.
May also hoped severing the link between the two parts of the deal would blunt opposition. That gamble
failed to pay off, as opposition lawmakers said if amounted to voting for a "blind Brexit"
with no idea what would happen next.
With May’s deal as good as dead, lawmakers who favor a "soft Brexit" plan to hold votes Monday
in an attempt to find a plan with majority support.
Opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn said Parliament had a "responsibility to find a
majority for a better deal for all the people of this country."
Business groups, who have been sounding the alarm for months about the damage a no-deal Brexit could do,
urged lawmakers to avert disaster.
"All eyes are now on Monday to discover what Parliament is for," said Josh Hardie,
director-general of the Confederation of British Industry. "The U.K.’s reputation, people’s jobs
and livelihoods are at stake. No deal is two weeks away."
If lawmakers back a new proposal, Britain would need to seek a new delay to Brexit from the bloc to
implement it.
The EU has indicated it could grant Britain an extension of up to a year if it plans to change course and
tack toward a softer departure. That would, however, require the U.K. to participate in elections for
the European Parliament in late May — something both the bloc and the British government have sought to
avoid.
The political morass has left Britons on both sides of the debate frustrated and angry. Some Brexit
supporters, who had planned to be celebrating Friday, were protesting instead.
Thousands converged on Parliament Square as lawmakers voted inside, waving Union Jack flags and singing,
"Bye-Bye EU."
Retired charity worker Mandy Childs, one of a band of hard-core Brexit supporters walking across England
to London under the slogan "Leave Means Leave," said she felt "heartbroken."
"We were told over a 100 times by a British prime minister that we would be leaving on the 29th of
March, 2019," she said.
"To do that, promise the British people that and then say ‘Actually, no, we need to just put it
back’ — absolute betrayal. And how dare she?"
___
Raf Casert in Brussels, Monika Scislowska in Warsaw and Jeff Schaeffer in Great Missenden, England,
contributed.
___
Follow AP’s full coverage of Brexit at: https://www.apnews.com/Brexit

No posts to display