Ky. gay marriage ban nixed, but no weddings yet

0

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Gay marriage advocates nationwide
heralded the ruling striking down deeply conservative Kentucky’s ban on
same-sex marriage as a significant milestone, though matrimonies won’t
begin in earnest there anytime soon.
Tuesday’s ruling by a federal
judge, which said Kentucky’s ban violated the Equal Protection Clause
of the U.S. Constitution, was put on hold because similar cases from
other states are being heard by a federal appeals court. It’s unclear
when Kentucky may begin issuing marriage licenses.
It’s a
conundrum that’s played out nationwide in the fight to legalize gay
marriage: The rulings mark a significant shift as rulings in favor of
gay marriage pile up, but confusion emerges as to when those marriages
can begin. In Wisconsin, for example, same-sex couples had a window of
about a week to get married before a judge ordered officials to stop
issuing them marriage licenses. And in Utah, more than 1,000 couples who
rushed to marry after a judge overturned that state’s ban will have to
keep waiting for many legal benefits of being married.
For now,
lead plaintiff Timothy Love of Louisville said he will celebrate the
latest victory with his partner of 34 years, 55-year-old Larry Ysunza.
"It’s a win and we’re going to win in the end. Now, the headline is ‘Love Wins,’" Love said
Tuesday afternoon.
He
also said he anticipated a wait: "We all probably have to wait until
the Supreme Court makes its decision" on gay marriage bans across the
nation.
In the Kentucky case, U.S. District Judge John G. Heyburn
II concluded that the state’s prohibition on same-sex couples being wed
violates the Equal Protection Clause by treating gay couples differently
than straight couples. Heyburn previously struck down Kentucky’s ban on
recognizing same-sex marriages from other states and countries, but he
put the implementation of that ruling on hold.
"Sometimes, by
upholding equal rights for a few, courts necessarily must require others
to forebear some prior conduct or restrain some personal instinct,"
Heyburn wrote. "Here, that would not seem to be the case. Assuring equal
protection for same-sex couples does not diminish the freedom of others
to any degree."
Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear said the state will appeal Heyburn’s decision.
The
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled arguments on rulings
from Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee in a single session on Aug.
6. Although the cases are unique, each deals with whether statewide gay
marriage bans violate the Constitution. It’s not yet clear if Kentucky’s
appeal of the latest decision will also be heard in that session.
Plaintiffs’
attorney Dan Canon said the appeals court decision would likely
determine the fate of Kentucky’s ban, regardless of any move by the
governor.
Heyburn noted that every federal court to consider a
same-sex marriage ban has found it unconstitutional. Gay rights
activists have won 18 cases in federal and state courts since the U.S.
Supreme Court in June 2013 struck down a key part of the federal Defense
of Marriage Act that denied to legally married same-sex couples a range
of benefits generally available to married heterosexuals.
Heyburn,
an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, dismissed the governor’s
argument that Kentucky’s prohibition encouraged, promoted and supported
relationships among people who have the "natural ability to procreate"
and a stable birth rate ensures the state’s long-term economic
stability.
"These arguments are not those of serious people," Heyburn wrote.
Martin
Cothran, a senior policy analyst with the Family Foundation of
Kentucky, said Heyburn erred in considering same-sex couples
"politically powerless" in today’s society.
"We’re thinking this
judge needs to get out a little more," Cothran said. "Or maybe he could
just subscribe to a newspaper or possibly turn on the television, where
he could see just how politically powerless are the people whose
political power helped produce this decision."
Evan Wolfson,
founder of Freedom to Marry, a group backing same-sex marriage, said the
ruling shows the public is ready to remove the legal bans put in place
in many states.
"It is wrong for the government to deny same-sex
couples the freedom to marry the person they love; a freedom that is
part of every American’s liberty and pursuit of happiness," Wolfson
said.

No posts to display