WASHINGTON (AP) — A government warning about the dangers
of increased use of trains to transport crude oil is giving a boost to
supporters of the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline.
U.S. and
Canadian accident investigators urged their governments Thursday to
impose new safety rules on so-called oil trains, warning that a "major
loss of life" could result from an accident involving the increasing use
of trains to transport large amounts of crude oil.
Pipeline
supporters said the unusual joint warning by the U.S. National
Transportation Safety Board and the Transportation Safety Board of
Canada highlights the need for Keystone XL, which would carry oil
derived from tar sands in western Canada to refineries on the U.S. Gulf
Coast. Oil started flowing Wednesday through a southern leg of the
pipeline from Oklahoma to the Houston region.
Sen. John Hoeven,
R-N.D., said the yearslong review of Keystone has forced oil companies
to look for alternatives to transport oil from the booming Bakken region
of North Dakota and Montana to refineries in the U.S. and Canada. A
planned spur connecting Keystone to the Bakken region would carry as
much as 100,000 barrels of oil a day.
"Clearly because this
project has been held up, that is creating more (oil) traffic by rail,"
Hoeven said Thursday. "Those companies are being forced to deliver their
product by rail because they don’t have the pipelines."
A pipeline opponent said Hoeven’s argument is based on a false choice between moving oil by rail or
pipeline.
"It’s
disingenuous for supporters of Keystone XL to suggest that if we build
Keystone, we won’t have safety risks posed by crude-by-rail, and if we
don’t built the pipeline we will" have those risks, said Anthony Swift,
an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council who has studied
the Canadian tar sands.
Shipment of oil by train is likely to
continue, whether or not Keystone XL is approved, Swift and others said,
as companies seek to capitalize on an oil boom that has pushed North
Dakota to become the second-largest oil producing state after Texas.
Both
rail and pipelines have good overall safety records, although several
high-profile accidents involving crude oil shipments — including a fiery
explosion in North Dakota last month and an explosion that killed 47
people in Canada last year — have raised alarms.
Spills from rail
cars occur more frequently than from pipelines but tend to be smaller.
Pipelines also can be built to avoid population centers and fragile
ecosystems, while crude-carrying trains frequently travel through large
cities such as Detroit and Philadelphia.
Chicago Mayor Rahm
Emanuel on Thursday called for new steps to protect communities from
accidents involving oil trains and other hazardous materials, including
fees on companies that ship crude oil by rail and on industries that use
oil.
The money would go into a fund to rebuild rail lines,
Emanuel told a meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Washington.
Chicago is a major freight rail hub. Emanuel’s proposal was endorsed by
the mayors of Philadelphia, Madison and Milwaukee, Wis., Kansas City,
Kan., and Peoria, Ill.
Rail industry officials bristled at the notion of a tax on their customers.
"Freight
railroads each year invest roughly $25 billion of their own funds into
the nationwide rail network so taxpayers don’t have to, and the result
is rail infrastructure that is the envy of the world," Hamberger said.
"As we’ve seen with other federal tax and fee proposals, the end result
is unfortunately that consumers often end up footing the bill."
Most
of the crude currently being moved by rail is light crude from the
Bakken region, not heavy tar sands oil from Canada, said Swift of the
Natural Resources Defense Council. Oil from tar sands is heavier and
more expensive to move by rail, Swift said, making trains less desirable
than pipelines for such oil. By contrast, energy companies in the
Bakken region embrace rail, since it is more flexible than pipelines.
North Dakota produces nearly a million barrels of oil a day, a majority
of it shipped by rail.
"Expansion of tar sands depends very much" on Keystone’s approval, Swift said.
A
spokesman for Calgary-based TransCanada, which has been seeking
approval for Keystone XL since 2008, said it is in everyone’s interest
to ensure that oil shipments are as safe as possible — whatever the
method.
TransCanada has agreed to implement 57 voluntary safety
measures for Keystone XL in a bid to convince U.S. officials that the
pipeline is a good risk.
"As we have said before, pipelines and
rail continue to be complementary parts of the transportation equation,
and the facts show that it is much safer to move large volumes of
products, like oil, longer distances by pipeline," said Shawn Howard, a
company spokesman.
TransCanada chief executive Russ Girling said
last week that if the Obama administration doesn’t approve the pipeline,
his company will look to build rail terminals in Alberta and Oklahoma.
Girling called pipelines "by far a safer alternative" to oil trains, but
said if customers want him to build rail terminals, he will.
___
Follow Matthew Daly on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights
reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.