To the Editor: Median BG household can't afford more taxes
Written by Kenneth Gutbrod   
Wednesday, 06 February 2013 10:17
The median household income of $30,000 in Bowling Green cannot support another tax increase.  (The Board of Education proposal would increase taxes $310 for the owner of a $150,000 home.) Teachers pay only 9% of their health insurance premium. For administrators the public picks up 100% of their pension and provides generous health coverage. Step increases are not a normal private industry practice. In the private sector it is rare for employers to pick up 100% of dental and vision benefits. In 2010 only 15% of private industry workers were in a defined benefit plan (pension).  Even fewer get COLA increases on their pension.
The Board of Education pays approximately 100 people a salary of over $75,000/annually. The majority of these people worked 184 days in the year. Additionally, last year the Board paid over $400,000 to employees for cashed in sick leave.  The average government worker already has a better pay/benefit package than the average private worker. Society can't afford to widen the gap further.
Public pensions and benefits take an ever increasing percentage of the purse. Because of declining wages in the private sector, combined with high rates of medical inflation, the current system is unsustainable. Teacher layoffs and larger class size are the wrong way to achieve budget balance.  We need reform in a way that more closely aligns pay and benefits with the private sector. The current trend line will bankrupt us.
Citizens should be reminded that by far the highest percentage of their property tax already goes to schools (64%). Additionally, we all pay a school income tax. The Board of Education intends to come back to the voters in 2017 for an even larger tax increase. Private sector citizens/businesses can't afford this burden. The current system cries out for reform. Before any citizen votes for any additional school tax, we should demand that the playing field be leveled between the public and private sectors.
All public employees need to participate in the same economic reality as the private sector. This means 401k's in place of defined benefit plans and greater participation in paying for health care. Voters should insist that our representatives crack the golden benefits that we, the ones paying the bill, have seen disappear years ago. We are on a treadmill that misallocates scarce resources. Vote for reform. Vote for families. Vote no!
Kenneth Gutbrod
Bowling Green
 

Comments  

 
# 2013-02-06 11:16
1. They pay more than 9% of their health care premium.
2. Those 184 days are contract days spread across 9 months of the year, and don't include weekends or school "vacations."
3. Contract days are determined by mandated classroom and other face-to-face time. They do not include necessary time for preparation and grading. Claiming that teachers are somehow not full-time and hard working is a dishonest and tired claim used to justify attacks on faculty as "overpaid."
4. Benefits plans (so-called "golden benefits") are cheaper for society as a whole--and your tax dollars--than a lack of benefits or an a la carte, pay-as-you-go system.
5. Teachers are educated professonals who make more than the median income but also contribute to the tax base.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 16:46
Kenneth Gutbrod let me introduce you to the most brilliant person with a higher level of intelligence than any other human - Lord Williams. He exist inside this little globe of his World were there is no reality and all the facts you have provided are false claims as he and his band of thieves are entitled to their upper your class level of expectations. Why they spend maybe 30 years teaching the same subject using the same notes that are only enhanced by the liberal soup of the day to poluted our childrens minds to weaken the moral fiber of our great country. Golden Benefits cheaper than society! Teachers make median income as they vote on their levy wage increases! Now Ken, don't you owe Lord Williams an apology as he is never wrong - never has been - never will be.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 18:33
Kenneth Gutbrod let me introduce you to "Failin' Phil Caron...the most opinionated..yet uninformed..poster here! He makes up for what he lacks in intellect by and overabundance of hatred and vitriol fueled by fear and Fox news! He violently opposes anything and everything that doesn't benefit him personally..and carries a monumental grudge against Mr. Williams due to losing nearly every debate he has entered into. He has a personal grudge against anyone in the teaching profession or who is employed as a public worker..or is unionised..or a Liberal..or uses facts in an argument..or is smarter than himself. He started off as mildly entertaining but has rapidly moved towards "pathetic". So..in summation..please excuse the village idiot..and never agree with Mr. Williams or be branded as a "lackey".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 08:52
BG Man (you don't have convictions enough to use your real name must mean you don't stand behing your dribble) I am working in a business where we are getting people back to work who have been left to depend on Obama unemployment conquest to keep his voting base and killing the taxpayers with out of control spending on food stamps and welfare as he has no plan and no budget. He can't wait for March so he can slip the debt elephant under the carpet once again. Those who have not become slaves to the government want to have a job even with little benefits to regain pride and help their families. So when I hear the upper your class education whinners who must work 185 days per year - I can't find any sysmpathy. They have very little liablity for results of students as they just put their time in and grab the golden ring everytime around
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 12:48
Lord Williams & his fact checkers who only speak the truth - respond to the above post regarding our countries major unemployment - you all really think you having nothing to do with the problem? People come out of college so well prepared they automaticly get jobs or is it really food stamps? I have yet to see any of you who read your scripts but have no solutions or accountability. I am sure Lord Williams if your job was posted, we would get many applicants just as ill prepared for less money. I assume you were at the protest for laying off 100 of your brothers and sisters. Rather than spreading the wealth by pay cuts the brother/motherhood will pick the bones of the losers who get laid off and divide up the loot. What a Union and team concept just to appear to be cutting cost.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 22:05
Our country's unemployment has gradually been coming down since the '08 crisis, and gradually improving, though not as much as anyone wants. Or can't you read, Caron?

Do you know anything about Dr. Williams' job or qualifications? No, I didn't think so. Do you know anything about his salary? No, I didn't think so. Do you know anything about his field? No, I didn't think so. You are clueless and without honor.

And you apparently never noticed that he is a professor at UT, not at BGSU, where he did teach before.

It's like I said: when you flunked out of school you called your teachers stupid and have been doing so ever since.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 13:33
So you would end food stamps and poverty-assistance programs ("welfare")?

You display an amazing lack of command of cause and effect in your logic.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 13:37
btw, the word is "drivel," not "dribble." Although considering your mind is always in the gutter, maybe you meant the former.

In the real world, school teachers are middle class, not upper class, and as people have explained again and again, there are only 55 days a year when teachers don't work that other people are working, and they aren't paid for them.

I'm sorry that the one teacher you knew was so bad that you assume all of them are bad.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 21:03
Mr. Caron, this is just a loathsome personal attack. In the midst of this attack you get some things wrong, as you usually do. You accuse teachers of never changing how they teach over 30 years, and imply Dr. Williams is one of them. 1. You are dead wrong about K-12 teachers; they are some of the most energetic and hard-working people people I know. 2. Dr. Williams is a college professor. 3. He is one of the best professors I have ever had, and he never teaches a class the same way twice. The rest of your post doesn't even make sense. You are a very nasty, small and, yes, stupid person.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 21:17
btw, all the points Dr. Williams raises are correct. The LTE is misleading.

You are the one constantly mocking Dr. Williams for acting superior, when all he ever did was post accurate information, which you did not, Mr. Caron. What is really weird is that you think that people who use logic and facts--which you do not--are the ones who are out of touch with reality. I have news for you. Your views are weird, poorly argued, not supported even by most conservatives, and claiming you have all the answers, claiming that the clearly very intelligent Dr. Williams is stupid, makes you just seem really stupid and nasty. It's like you flunked out of school, called the teachers stupid and have been doing so ever since.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 15:02
Chris Williams is amazing. His study of all things and worldly travels on the government dime make hime all knowing. Plus since he neither lives or works in BG he really is best to tell us lowerings what to do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 15:44
Phil Caron does not live in BG either.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 23:19
Right. Phil lives in a very BIG house in Perrysburg.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 11:18
It's all becoming clear now! Caron is an anti union anti public employee anti education Perrysburg elitist that lives in a big house (management?)..and hates to see anyone but people like himself do well financially! His counterpart here in BG is Oldham...who owns multiple properties but whines about living on a "retirement income) while also venting on unions and teachers. A pattern here? Only land barons or management types deserve the spoils..the rest of us should shut up and work for minimum wage at Mcdonalds? And they have the gall to call Liberals elitist!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 15:24
And a lot of the anti-BGSU, anti-higher ed ranters got their degrees in business and marketing, the only departments where faculty actually make the 6-figure salaries they then use in order to complain about the "overpaid" supposed "dead weight" whose positions are being eliminated.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 15:44
I am so glad people are so anti-education and anti-teacher. It really does make you understand the world we live in today. My friend is a teacher who spends over $800 per year of their money to help buy supplies for students and classroom. I may add most all of that at local BG businesses (not box stores). I would guess many teachers do this kind of thing in Northwest Ohio.
No other profession in society would be bereated for their experience and education levels. I would bet all I have that teachers could pay 15% of their health care and have a severence package reduced to 3 days of time and people would still complain. My friend I spoke of has a masters degree + 60 additional graduate hours and has taught 27 years. What is that person worth in the minds of the conservative anti public education world?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 19:17
It's all part of the Conservative agenda..keep the intelligence level low and the people uninformed and afraid...look at the level of education in the states that vote Republican! Add to that those ..like Kasich...who cut funding for schools to increase the burden on the public..all the while pushing for Charter schools so their corporate backers make more money. And the sheep blindly buy into the ruse...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 18:31
I taught at BGSU for a number of years, and lived in BG for 15. I was a "parent" to three foreign exchange students who went through BGCS and I am a personal friend of a great many teachers. You speak of my knowledge of education as if it is somehow inappropriate. I am really not saying anything one way or another to advocate the levy (though I personally would support it if I still lived in BG). I am merely correcting errors.

Also, your comment about the "government dime" is inaccurate. If you look at the financing of public universities, they are mostly private institutions nowadays, getting only 26% of their funding from the state. Besides, my travels have been on my own dime, unless you want to audit my mostly private salary.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:06
Chris, some people are jealous of others accomplishments and the desire to pick apart another is at the top of their agenda. Phil has to remember that Perrysburg has just as many educational problems. By the way if he lives in a big house that means he has money, so why is he complaining? Or is he just talking because he can?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 19:49
Phil CW has his right to choose of words, just like you. It makes me LOL when I read all your comments, even though some points seem to be important you seem to point the finger in Chris W face.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 16:52
Teachers should have five year contacts that are bid on by other teachers who have the same credentials to lower our education cost. Every five years teachers should take their antiquated knowledge and get a real job for 5 years to see if what they are teaching still works. If they fail, they should not be allowed back into the teaching profession and maybe learn a trade like running the french fry section of the burger place. They are glorified overpaid as noted by Ken and there is no parity in our communities on average. They are the largest PAC who controls local elections and owns many politicians. just look at all the Ohio Revised Code legislation that favors passing a levy and how many times you can put a levy on the ballot. There are now far more on the nipple than the cow can produce so it is time as Ken says to level field.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 08:39
Whimsical Lord Williams & BG Man above is a real plan that would determine if your teaching techniques are antiquated with little application to the real world. Colleges are striving to force students to spend 5 years to get a piece of paper but no job just to make sure they really put kids and families in debt to make sure their entitlement gravy train stays on track. Reapplying for their jobs every five years will make sure we get the best at the least price just like other government contract work. Should we have one party rule as suggested by Whimsy we would no longer be a free country. The education system is like the Post Office - bloated beyond their entitlement budgets and the only solution is to wipe the slate clean and start over as the govenment is not capable of being accountable with the only solution being more taxes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 09:55
When did I ever suggest one-party rule? You're the person who seems to think he is smarter than everybody else and mocks anybody who disagrees with you while pulling your "data" out of God-knows-where.

Your "idea" is ignorant and shows nothing but contempt for teachers, their professionalism , their training, and the fact that they are energetic and constantly retooling to respond to the educational needs of the students.

It isn't the job of universities to give kids jobs. It is the job of universities to educate them so that they can get jobs for themselves.

You really think that educators and educated people are the enemy, don't you?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 10:27
Caron,once again your comments make no sense. What kind of views of careers, training, and livelihoods do you have that you would prefer to see teachers as temporary workers subject to matters beyond their control, competing for ever smaller salaries--talk about out of touch with reality! Do you think it unfair that someone with a college degree makes more than someone without?

What on earth is the college-teaching "entitlement gravy train?" Last I checked, college professors work for a living and are held accountable. Salaries aren't "entitlements."

FWIW, the problems the post office has is that they have been forced by congress to fund their pensions far into the future as a payment now in the present. No other government organization has that burden. It isn't "bloated." Again, you are misinforemd.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 10:34
If we followed the backward ideas of Phil Caron, the US would fail.

This guy HATES the idea of education.

He obviously failed out somewhere along the line.

Probably 7th grade.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 15:01
All lies. It's time for real education reform and it start with what Kenneth is talking about. End employee cash sick leave tomorrow and let's begin the discussion of moving all public workers to the glorious new Obamacare.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 18:34
Full-time faculty at BGSU and UT have already have health care that is within the recommended guidelines of Obamacare. It is not lavish.

Maybe you think all health insurance is theft and should be illegal?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 11:33
Kenneth,

Well stated reform is needed!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 14:59
The unions is choking the life out of the education system. I can believe how oblivious certain readers like Williams is to what is going on the private non-public world.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 18:37
You overestimate how much the public universities are in fact "public."

So if YOUR "private non-public world" is engaged in a race to the bottom when it comes to slashing salaries and benefits, do you think that is a good thing for society? for the economy? Do you think health care should just be fee-for service and out of pocket?

Do you think it unfair that people with a lot of academic training have an advantage when it comes to competing for employment against those who lack that background?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 11:25
The unions just need to go, and then the reform can start.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 14:55
Kasich tried. Take your best shot!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 14:57
The corporations are choking the life out of the middle class...i can't believe how oblivious certain readers like 'Failin' Phil Caron and Old-ham are as to whats going on in the REAL world.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 12:24
Well said Mr.Gutbrod. Just Google Bowling Green School District (Ohio)demograph ics and look at retiree income too.
What I would like to see is a status-quo increase, that would allow for cuts in state spending, utility increases, but NO STEP or COLA. Make the conversion to 401K's, the union BE DAMNED. If it takes a strike, SO BE IT!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 16:42
Instead of trying to tear down someone else's livlihood...how about trying to better yourself? People work for years ..often starting with a low wage/benefit job..and over the years, better their positions. You..on the other hand..denigrate unions and take whatever the boss throws at you..then complain..or point fingers at those more fortunate. Go to college! Join a union! Man up and stand up to your employer! Too many people in this country don't have the backbone to fight for their share..and whine about their brothers and sisters who have more than they do. If everyone demanded half what the bosses..Administrators, CEO's..and stockholders lavish upon themselves..we wouldn't be pitted against each other..which is JUST what they want! Divide the workforce against itself..and sit back and count your money!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 23:27
Has nothing to do with tearing down another person's livelihood. As a taxpayer, we are the boss or CEO you refer to. And as such, We deserve to and will have a say in what we pay for and accept. However, the public school system and teacher's union seems to think otherwise - and that needs to change. Those poor sorry slobs you seem to think are not "manning up", are the same individuals you are asking to pay more taxes in order to support your union. I would suggest you show a little more respect for the people paying the bills. To hold a public hostage by threatening to strike and put the kids out of school, is by no means manning up. It is taking advantage of a very flawed system. But no need to worry, this will change. Union membership is collapsing across the country for a reason.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 14:58
It's their turn to negotiate in good faith! Vote NO until they give solid concessions.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 09:00
The only "solid concessions" you would approve would be involve the slashing of pay and benefits. I don't think a percentage adjustment in the contribution would do it for you.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 23:52
Good points Pro.. Divide and conquer,you gotta love CEO's..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:12
That's not fair to he kids, they will suffer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 12:52
Also remember that the median family income is approximately $60.000 dollars.

Also the median household income is $34,000 dollars.

Differences in the calculation of college students and how they are reported. Statistics can be found on the U.S. census website
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 18:46
"... we should demand that the playing field be leveled between the public and private sectors."

I recently began teaching. I am from the private sector and let me tell you, the compensation for teaching is MUCH less than a private position requiring equal education and experience. You don't want the playing field leveled. If it were teachers would have much higher compensation.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 18:47
"...these people worked 184 days in the year." First a math lesson. The average person works 365 days/yr - 104 weekend days - 10 national holidays - 10 vacation days = 239 days. Teachers work 239 days/yr - 184 days/yr = 55 days/yr less than the average worker. They are not paid for these days. Their pay may be distributed over twelve months, but this does not mean that they are being paid for days they don't work. Many need to take summer jobs.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-06 23:59
Want good teachers?Pay them the competitive rate.34K sounds low to me for new hires,with these skill sets..My problem is with the funding.Perhaps the new Kasich budget will help?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 14:57
The starting rate is kept artificially low by the union.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 16:49
They never want the public to go beyond the day they start teaching when they jump on the money wagon with step increases, sick time, and get into the next level. This is done so they can whine to the public with their bait and switch to keep the greed entitlement machine rolling.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 19:00
Everyone knows the unions sets the wages super low to attempt to keep the supply even remotely under control, and even then people line up around the block for jobs at decent school systems like BG.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 10:57
I have kids in school so I absolutely want great teachers for them. However, There are so many fundamental problems with the budgets it must get addressed. I have 5 immediate family members that are teachers in various local districts, each has told me that they can't believe how much everyone else has to pay for insurance. Until faculty (administrators also) start paying the same % the rest of the world pays I can't support anything. Let's also not forget that the schools have an over abundance of "administrators" to many chiefs, some need to go. Start covering a larger share of your basically free insurance, get your act together fiscally and I can then consider supporting you, the free ride on my $ needs to come to an end.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 12:35
Now Robert you are going to get put into the ignorant catagory by Whimiscal Lord Williams and his little band of Johnny / Judy one notes. They are above question and business as usual is their only tune. They have all built their empires and filled their offices with non-value added administrators with assistants to their assistants and Ozzie & Harriet vintage Secretaries. They claim they just teach and have no responsiblity on student success based upon their dribble. They are all so insecure they cannot exist with their Unions who hold taxpayer hostage with never endding quest for more of your money. There would never be a levy big enough or wage and benefits enough as they are blind to reality. They are the Post Office as it relates to no accountablity with entitlement for their accumulated sick day payouts, pensions, and wages.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 18:41
Phil, what planet did you fall to earth from? You are clueless. The picture you paint is meaningless and fault.

I don't agree with Robert's points, and he has been "fed a line" about how little public educators pay. But he at least has a legitimate point of view. And he doesn't come across as the clueless idiot you do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:26
Phil-part of that is the nation has said kids aren't up to par with other worldly smarts. The teachers are now only teaching to prepare kids for the passing tests. Most teachers are concerned about that but that's what the ad-mids are pushing them to do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 08:53
This is very true! There was a long essay just published by a retiring K-12 teacher, directed at college professors, on the theme of "don't blame us: look at what the testing mandates are doing." Students are less and less taught how to write--there is no time--and when standardized tests include writing components, they are scored using rubrics that do not reward reasoning and quality but only if enough key-words are cited, whether they are used correctly or incorrectly. The required testing is enormously expensive, not least in the time it takes from teaching material and engaging students. The multiple-choice questions that dominate them have at best just a limited value; but they are used because they are easier and cheaper to grade.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 13:04
When will it stop?
Every year the hand is out for more. Yes, the state funding system is corrupt. We need real cuts. Let's try cutting 1/2 the administration or at least pay. Let's charge for buses, sports and anything else non school day. We could go to a 4 day school week. When "they" say they can't cut anymore--please realize this is crap. Fact is: our local schools (and government)do not do this because they think they are above the law/change. It's great that there are sooo many people making six figures in BG that they vote for every levy. It doesn't hurt you to pay a little more when you make that kind of bank. Our teachers are great! The curriculum is great! Let's get back to what school is for: (EDUCATION) and I think you'll find we don't have a $$ problem at all! Surprise..the jokes on us!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-07 18:58
I'm sorry, my family hasn't seen more then a combined 2% raise in 4 years and our healthcare costs have almost doubled putting in the negative. Now they keep asking for more and more money, we just cant afford it. Vote NO!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 08:44
Supreme Being Williams - we are getting many post that don't support your tunnel vision that makes the schools look absolutely flawless while providing a finely tuned teaching machine that produces accummulated benefits and wages not seen in the real world that surrounds them. I am proud of being a clueless idiot when I know I have considerable support. I am convinced if administrators did not show up for a month teachers would teach and education would continue at whatever level they did before.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 11:35
You have a ridiculously--childishly-- simplistic view of the world, where either things are absolutely horrible or absolutely fantastic. It's why you presume that anyone who disagrees with you "worships" something you dislike or thinks that they are "supreme." Childishness of that sort is profoundly offensive to any thinking human being. I never claimed anything was "absolutely flawless."

However, teachers work a lot harder and are more up-to-date, engaged, and concerned about the relevance of what they bring to the classroom than you assert, Phil "educators are fungus" Caron.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 09:02
exactly, while faculty at every school pay nearly nothing for health care....ALL WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS. These levies are not "for the kids" they are for banked sick days, free insurance, step raises, etc. there comes a time when things have to change and that's now. Typical large company the employee pays about 600.00 a month for a family plan, teachers and administrators get in this ballpark you'll see me start supporting levies, until then the levies are just so these folks can keep these exorbitant benefits that are being sustained by our tax dollars.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 10:19
We need to look at the Return on investment of servicing the Custer area students. Yes the BG school system services students in Custer, OH.

Maybe we need to shrink the outlying areas we services and give those students to Otsego, MCComb and Elmwood.

This would allow for savings in staff needed and lower transportation costs.

Just another case for the State to reduce from 613 districts to 88. What a huge potential to consolidate and save money.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 13:15
Rocket 1 is number one on target with a huge part of the issue needing to reduce the districts to 88 or less. Unfortunately it would take someone with a vision and ability to focus on the reduction of redunancy along with a business sense. This is no different than the companies that buy companies every day to eliminate duplication and cost while maintaining quality. Due to the fact education is only interested in Empire building they would never envision common sense. Education was built upon the mission of improving youth to be successful - today it is the "what's in it for me" and don't touch my benefits regardless of logic or the crumbling tax base around them. The biggest issue is they live in a bubble and don't have the incentive or spirt to challenge their structure. They just love their bloated organizations and greed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 18:16
You sound like a typical mid-level management type. You have your big house in Perrysburg..(elitist?) and could care less about anything else but making and keeping more for yourself no matter who's expense it comes at. "Empire Building".."What's in it for me?".."Business sense?"..Yep...management buzzwords. Um..but it's the filthy LIBERALS that are elitists? Sickening...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:38
Look to the South, in Southern Georgia they have on school system per county. Just think how all the teachers could work together. Help could be maintained by lower income areas to balance out the whole county. I think hat would work in Ohio. It's just the snotty districts that would complain. OMG could one see St. John's become part of TBS? Or P-burg part of North Baltimore? We could if everyone would work together.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 11:23
Rocket 1, I mean no disrespect here, but we would be shooting ourselves in the foot, if the school district would dump those areas. If it were not for Custer, Milton Center, Rudolph and Portage, that INCOME TAX LEVY would have passed last November.Roughly 1000 voting NO!(HELL NO!) made the levy fail.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:41
No I don't live there and I voted "NO" many people around BG voted "NO"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 14:26
Just cant afford it. No more new tax increases of any kind. They need to learn within their budget. Vote NO!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 16:38
Schools do live within their budgets, their budgets keep getting slashed by Republicans at the state.

If I have to pay for your wars and medicare, you help pay for my kids education.

That's the way society works folks. Kids have rights too, not just old hams.

"Back when I was a kids..."

Stop it. Back when you were kids someone paid for your education.

Now return the favor before you're gone...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 16:58
Nice. Delusional but nice. Considering how many cuts came from Strickland finger pointing isnt the answer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-08 18:09
Just read the paper today regarding the state's school budget...Ottawa Hills gets a million more state dollars? Springfield gets 5k? BG gets zip...nothing more. All this after the massive previous cuts of 80k from schools? Easy to say "Live within your budget" when your budget gets cut this badly? And funny how i hear no complaints from Oldham or Caron about the TRILLIONS we have spent (and ARE spending) on fighting wars in other countries...in fact..most CONservatives want more $$ pumped into the military. Where is the logic here? You place more value on blowing up and rebuilding other countries than educating our kids? Can someone say "Misplaced Priorities"?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:43
It depends on how much property one owns. If you just own a house hat's not bad but if you own more then it hits hard in the pocket.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 01:08
"Back when you were kids someone paid for your education"

Well...this part is true..citizens of the past paid for education not administration salaries above the average wage. Citizens before us paid for education..not administration raises every year...citizens before us paid for education..not sports directors and fancy stadiums..citizens before us paid for education benefits beyond the rest of society...Many good leaders of this country came out of one room school houses. There were no administrators and unions playing havoc on this country. It's time that we take back control of the schools. They are our schools..not some board...not some union..We pay for them-therefore we should have a vote and control of where the money goes instead of letting the cronies vote themselves raises year after year..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 10:17
Yeah...why do you think we pushed women into teaching in the first place? Because we could pay them less! Next thing ya know..men start teaching..they all want money for their services...and rights at work...time to run schools like businesses! Too bad we couldn't ship 'em overseas..i bet they'd teach for a lot less in India!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 07:42
I see all the usual whiners are back.

Funny- you have all the answers but never run for the BOE or anything else. But you always step up to complain.

And please - don't give me the "I'll support schools if they do this" routine.

Most of you whiners NEVER support anything except your fellow whiners and never will.

You want change - run for office. Oh yes that would require you to do more than whine wouldn't it?

Okay I'll let you go back to your whine party now.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 08:58
You cannot run for office in this are on a change platform. The "majority" would never let it happen. Obama ran on "change" and look where that got us.. BG schools and Obama's debt...does anyone see similarities?
Funny how a majority of the board has direct connections to the schools and unions in some form. Every member but one is on a public pension and even some of them are double dipping. There's no way they would ever vote to make changes against their "system." We need new laws stating that there has to be equal representation of interest from the private sector in running the schools. What happened to no taxation without (fair and unbiased) representation.
The tide is changing..I hope people in this county are waking up..Follow the money and I think you will find that "think of the children" threats will no longer work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-10 09:36
Get the educators out of education?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 09:09
and for the record, I'm not promoting that we spend more $$ on our military. I'm not promoting that we close schools or lay off teachers. There is plenty of cash in the system. You cannot continue to beat up on the taxpayer and the land owners that put food on your table. We've had enough. If this system doesn't want to change..then so be it. There are many charter schools doing just fine. This may come off as harsh..but this is a direct repeat of what happened in the early 90's. (Recap: Yep..our budget is fine...Yep we've got plenty of cash....ooops..we're 3 million in the hole...gonna have to fire all the teachers...no new books...)funny how now with all the new buildings and raises at the top..we're back to oops...we're 3 million in the hole. Take 2..roll the scare tactics campaign app..version 2.0. See you all at the polls!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 11:04
watching the whiners, let me be clear, I am for a fair salary for the teachers. I believe the step-raise system should be scrapped (City of B.G. did this years ago) and a merit system of raises be put in place.Fringe benefits need to be looked at,especially sick-time. Public workers need to be protected from long term injury or illness, but not CASH REWARDS at retirement. I truly believe we, the taxpayer are on a catastrophic course if some changes are not made soon.As for attending a board meeting,forget about it, all are from the education field and tend to lean in favor of the teachers and their contracts.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-09 15:59
To watching whiners:

First, I do more the first two days of the week than you do the entire week. As for not supporting anything, my business donates more to local school fund raisers in 3 months than you have in your entire life. I just cannot sit back and watching the hands keep coming out when no changes are being made. Talk about whiners, instead of making changes they just cry that money has been cut, blah, blah, blah, and instead of cutting expenses we just need MORE money. The schools don't have a funding problem, they have a spending problem. I'm no longer paying for banked sick days, nearly free health care, continual step raises, more and more "administrators", etc. it has to end. The reason the BG schools didn't get anymore money is because they ARE ALREADY OVER FUNDED!!!!! Take your heads out of the sand sheeple
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 09:10
I'll go back to the whine party only if you serve those little cheese blocks.....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 08:29
This is hilarious. People acting like children while arguing about supporting children. I'm glad I moved out of BG, you people are insane.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 11:54
The way things are going with the local government..a lot of people are going to be saying bye bye.. and then there will be a even bigger mess. Many ciitizens in the Bowling Green City Distict are not anti-teacher or anti-children. What they are against is business as usual with the mismanagement of money and the attitude that they are just entitled to significantly increase someones taxes (without thinking of how it might impact them economically) so they can "plan themselves a raise. Non pensioned individuals are tired of the games. We're tired of the the "think of the children threats." Disband the whole administration, put someone in there with some common sense and pay for what needs paid (buildings, good teacher salaries, books, and that's it. The only reason someone would be against such a stance is that they are an administrator.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 15:23
Northwestohio is totally on target and has identified the heart of the issue. Lord Williams and his little band of lackeys in their stink tank have no defense for this kinda logic that speaks the truth. His little group as a school project are looking up my house and making assumptions on me being one of those billionaire republicans. Well I can't afford to retire, have no pension, and cannot live on social security. I did not get huge sick pay payouts, major health benefits or other windfalls gained by the education crowd taking a huge majority of my property taxes - more than all other put together. At some point like many, I will be forced to sell my house as I can't afford the never ending greed of education on our taxdollars so they can get some fresh meat, have a house valued higher to suck more money from the empty nipple.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 17:31
Caron, there is no "little band." There are no "lackeys." I don't know any of the others personally. I couldn't care less how big your house is or where it is located. However, you did invite the negative criticism when you accused educators of being "upper class" and exaggerated the extent of their benefits and supposed overpayment.

You earn no good will by calling educators "fungus" and refusing to understand anything about the work they do. And your constant exaggeration, including trying to imply that anybody to the left of your very right-wing self is in a tiny minority shows that you really pay no attention to any public opinion polls or even the results of the last election. Your side lost. Big. Even in Wood County. Mocking me for no good reason won't make it any better.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 17:37
You just didn't work hard enough, Phil. Not everyone can afford a giant house like that. You are going to have to learn to live within your means!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:21
Seems to me you should join a union! Oh..and it's also disconcerting the amount of times you feel you have to use the words "nipple" and "teat" in your posts....As to Williams little "group" ..i don't even know the man...there just happen to be more people that agree with him than agree with you. Get over it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 09:14
I'm sorry, Phil...I missed it. What kind of cheese did you want with your whine????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 15:26
You need to look more closely at the impact on state-wide cuts and allocation in funding (see related stories in the Sentinel) and on the relation between training, experience, and value of the individual teachers before you can make blanket statements about there being a "spending problem, not a funding problem."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 21:02
Chris he does have a point. I think most of his problems are his choice of words. As I said earlier he has a right to writing as you do. Chris one has to admit there should be a different way to find most of early education.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 19:33
OK, let's look at the state cuts. From the Board's recent LTTE, $2.4 million in cuts over the past 3 years. That comes out to an average of $800,000 per year. So why do they need $4 million more per year (forever)?!? Look at the value of the individual teachers? Hmm, sounds a lot like individual resposponsibili ty and accountability; 2 things the Teachers' union will find to the end over. If you want to value the individual teachers, then let's do that. Scrap the automatic step increases and increases for taking more classes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-13 08:30
"increases for taking more classes"--if you are referring to increases for earning a master's degree, then this is a rather cheap dismissal of what that means and what is involved. Specialist positions usually require master's degrees. The teacher has to pay tuition out of pocket and only receives a portion back in reimbursement, after the fact. The salary increase is intended as an offset. Our global competitors encourage their teachers to earn higher degrees, bring their knowledge back into the classroom (as opposed to going into administration) , and pay them accordingly. Ideally you want teachers as far as possible to bring up-to-date graduate-level knowledge directly into the classroom in a way that can be exciting and motivating for kids. It isn't an assembly line.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:22
Funny..i see no mass exodus of people from BG...some appreciate the superior school system we have.....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:57
You are right, when we had money it was fine but things now have changed. We are into a different time as US citizens we find ourselves in a mess. When everything falls apart we all loose. The country has gotten way to big to fast. To much building, to high of wages, to many political decisions, to many foreign people coming to he US, not enough conservation, a lot of bi-racial families, many strange ideas. Do I need to go any farther? No one ever sees that and I can imagine how many writers will honk I am old fashioned and living in the past. The past is the perfect example of all the sacrifices our gore-father gave to get us this far.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 17:12
Some people have "book smarts" and/or "street smarts." A M.A., allows me to claim some "book smarts." Thank god I also have the "street smarts" to identify a red herring when I hear one." The "state budget issue" is just government disinformation and a front by the administration to justify higher taxation. If the "state budget issue" had any truth, then all the schools would of lost funding instead of 4 gaining money and the rest unchanged. We keep being told that funding was cut and now the Sentinel reports funding is unchanged. Somebody is feeding us b.s. I'm sure the statisticians out there will manipulate it to make it look like I don't understand what I'm reading. Case in point: I think it's the administration that doesn't understand the concept of staying within a budget. Make it work..or cut until it does. It's not rocket science.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 19:27
My statements correct and the state backs it up. The new allocation of state funds looks at a districts current/future income to see if it is well funded or under funded, if it is well funded they get little to nothing, if underfunded they get more state funds to get them where they need to be. Surprise surprise BG schools got nothing because because they are OVER FUNDED, the states findings prove that this new levy is not "for the kids".
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 13:51
So...Ottawa Hills is underfunded and deserves another million plus $$$ in funding? Right.....
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-11 20:08
teachers are so way over paid it makes me sick,vote no.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 09:00
So you want to see pay cuts? The best new teachers coming out with education degrees will simply go elsewhere when they hit the market, leaving only those candidates who can't get better jobs. Of course, if one did not oneself do well in school, one might not notice the difference.

Does it also make you sick how much lawyers, doctors, other people with graduate and professional degrees are paid? On any statewide or national basis, teachers are NOT overpaid.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 10:51
Chris,

New Teachers are all ready going elsewhere!!!!!

ALL the student teachers that have taught my children have all stated they are leaving OHIO.

There are very few education oportunitites in OHIO. Even less for educators who have taken time off to raise kids and now want to get back in the class room.

If you have experience then you have very little chance to get back into education.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 14:24
Lies. They are lining up around the block to get into schools like BG.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-13 08:34
They do prefer BG over many other schools, but largely because of the quality education it offers (comparatively speaking) and the respect in which the community holds the teachers. However, fewer and fewer of the BEST college students are wanting to go into K-12 education at all. That's no lie. And when you cite "100s" of applications for any position, remember that there are also 100s of openings statewide and nationwide at any given time. Ohio education students don't just stick to Ohio, as Rocket 1 notes above.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 14:58
Lord Williams lawyers, doctors, and other professionals get paid for being accountable for their customers results. When they are successful they are positioned to get more customers and make more money based on their follow through to their profession. Once students are thrown into the streets of unemployment, their is no more accountability while the educators continue to get more of our taxes with their entitlement greed. The missing link is competition as noted by Rocket 1 within the education system. Allowing the money to follow the student and their success would create the schools that are not ME TOO schools. They rather compare how losey they are compared to similar districts meaning they are entitled to more. This is not just teachers but the whole school bureacracy that eats 80% of your property taxes!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 16:18
That's not what Rocket 1 was saying.

Are you seriously suggesting that if students don't get jobs, school teachers should lose theirs?

Where is the responsibility of parents? Of the students themselves?

There's a good reason nobody seriously talking about school reform or teacher accountability--not even on the right--has made the suggestions you have, Caron.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 16:52
BG schools are rated "Excellent"...teachers are doing their jobs..it's up to the students to take that education and do something with it. You are getting more "out there" and desperate to prove whatever point it is you are shooting for with every post. Give it up before you make an even bigger fool of yourself..if that's possible.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 16:40
Lord Williams the biggest difference between those you are crying about above is none of these people are not taking 80% est. of your property taxes to pay for average entitlment performance. YOu work for us even though you have a much higher opinion of who you are on the food chain and upper your class! Taxpayers should have more say in how much gets approved. Now it appears the balance of opinion is not just you and your little band of think alike lackies who always has their hand in our pocket. The laws need to be changed to support those paying the bill.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-13 08:39
Only 26% of higher ed funding comes from the state. That correlates mostly to the tuition difference between in-state and out-of-state. So the notion that college professors are owned by the taxpayers is--problematic.

Are you seriously suggesting that taxpayers with no professional involvement in education should be dictating hiring, firing, what is taught, etc.? It's like when you were supporting your crazy, antagonistic, anti-educator friend for the Perrysburg school board.

And, seriously, though, just because the "little band" has no representation in your household doesn't mean that they are not the majority even in this relatively conservative part of the state. You are the definition of a solipsist. Look it up.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 06:58
Wow! Another all-knowing education expert who's probably never worked a day in a school, but somehow knows all about it.

I'm sure you've never raised the prices at your business as your costs went up. Still charging the same as 2 years ago, 5 years, 10 years ago? But you expect the cost of education to stay the same or drop.

I will agree with you on this:
I'm sure all you whiners do more whining in two hours than the rest of do in a year.

In the meantime I'm sure you'll all: Whine On!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 14:23
Actually the education system does get more money as the homes are reappraised over time, so the 45K home that is now worth 135K fifty years later is paying triple the amount of taxes.

Also, the same principal goes for the income tax that supports BG school, IF the school were on the same inflation rate of the community then the needs would match. Unfortunately they are spending more the average citizens average raise would support in additional revenue..
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 06:59
Phil: If you're so strapped take your professional skills to one of those "become a teacher in 6 months" deals some states are so great with and voila - your money problems are over!

You've told us teaching is a such lucrative deal so do it, fix the system while you're there (since you have all the answers), and get rich all at once.

Until then: Whine On!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 10:10
All I can say is last night 2/11 at the 8th grade parent information night for BGHS the guidance counselor leading the meeting / Power point needs to review her works as she had numerous grammatical and spelling errors in her presentation. Her power point was very unprofessional and showed a lack of effort.

As a parent this makes me question the quality of education being offered at BGHS.

I can say is this is reason number one for school choice / State Funding to follow a student. Introduce competition into schooling and let the parents choose the best option for their children the cream of the schools will rise to the top.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 11:48
Could someone please define for me "pension picked up by the board", which appears in teacher contracts around the state? I might add, it does not appear in other unionized public employee contracts.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 12:12
Why are some stuck on the issue being teachers and their pay? Teachers deserve fair pay. If you take a job with lower pay..you go from looking at a Cadillac (Ottawa Hills) to looking at something like a Hyundai/Kia that is affordable and still get's the job done(Bowling Green). Cars go up and sensible people drive what they can afford. BG administrators/career union people continue to want to drive a Bentley and feel the taxpayers should fund it. Instead of more trimming, they continue to spew the concept that the only way to operate without a levy is to fire teachers. That's like saying that millions of Americans can only survive by winning the lottery if their hours are trimmed. Most people will not win the lottery. Families work together within a budget and cut where they have to. There is still room to trim. Who agrees?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 12:13
I think with the defeat of this tax levy in the spring, a watershed moment will occur for the taxpayer. Teacher contracts are up for renewal in August 2013. That means negotiations will have to start after we go to the polls. The well is almost dry. The board can promise all it wants, but in the end will not be able to deliver the raises planned. By that I mean, the BGCS Treasurer has projected out a 5 year plan with certain assumptions related to salary,health benefits, etc.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-12 12:38
-Watching the Whiners-
At what point of increases would you whine"? Every year we're told "this is the last one." Should one have to live in section 8 because the taxes are so high that nobody can even put food on the table? You're probably going to say this couldn't happen..but think again. If we went to say a 25% income tax someone making 100k would still have 75k left and could live. Someone making 25 k would be thrown into poverty (from school taxes alone). The only way to make it work is to create fair brackets and if you make above 60k you would pay 50% of your salary..Below 60k- you pay 10%.(% inflated to make a point). Sooner or later you too, would whine. The reason the rich get richer is because they have money left beyond living..not because someone making lower wages is "wasting" their money.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-13 05:57
BTW your property taxes on a levy don't rise as the value of your property increases. A levy only collects its original amount no matter what happens to property values. So when a new house is built it merely spreads the tax over more people and reduces the share paid by all. The total amount collected doesn't go up.

Reduction of Outside Mills
In 1976, the Ohio legislature enacted House Bill 920, which requires the effective millage of voted property tax levies to be reduced in proportion to rising property values, to protect property owners from paying more taxes on a given levy than they originally approved. The law was subsequently incorporated into the Ohio Constitution as Article XII, Section 2a(C)(2)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2013-02-13 09:01
I'm sure you've never raised the prices at your business as your costs went up. Still charging the same as 2 years ago, 5 years, 10 years ago? But you expect the cost of education to stay the same or drop.
-------------------------------------
You've obviously only ever worked for someone who worried about everything for you. Have prices gone up at times, yes, has my pay personally gone up with those price increases? NO! Have I taken pay cuts for myself when things got tigh? yes! Comparing me to a school district doesn't really work, I'm actually aware that my compensation can't continually rise regardless of the economy but that's where I'm different. If I could force people to pay me through levies I would be fine!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Swamp fest gets the blues
05/20/2013 | DAVID DUPONT Sentinel Arts & Entertainment Editor
article thumbnail

Guitarist Elvin Bishop, who helped give white kids the blues in the 1960s, will be one [ ... ]


Miller an advocate for those in need
05/20/2013 | Sentinel-Tribune
article thumbnail

David C. Miller For more than three decades, David C. Miller was the voice of the [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles