|To the Editor: Doctor says PSA test valuable option|
|Written by Andre Gilbert, MD|
|Wednesday, 20 June 2012 10:17|
As a urologist practicing in northwest Ohio, I am gravely concerned by the new recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. These recommendations do a great disservice to men around the country, particularly those with a higher risk of the disease (i.e., African American men, those with a family history of the disease, those who are underinsured and those who live in rural areas with limited healthcare access).
The decision to be tested for prostate cancer is an individual decision that men should discuss with their physicians; there is no single standard that applies to all men - nor should there be. No one can dispute that the PSA test has limitations, but when used and interpreted appropriately, the test provides valuable information in the diagnosis, pre-treatment staging, risk assessment and monitoring of prostate cancer patients. The American Urological Association recommends that the best decisions regarding prostate cancer testing comes from individualized discussions between a man and his urologist.
It would be barbaric to universally dismiss the PSA test before a suitable alternative to prostate cancer diagnosis is available. There are many men in our community who would tell you that a PSA test saved their life.
Andre Gilbert, MD
Front Page Stories
|Local cities see growth
05/23/2013 | JAN LARSON McLAUGHLIN Sentinel County Editor
While many other cities in the region are watching their populations shrink, Wood Coun [ ... ]
|Perrysburg at odds on member for council|
05/23/2013 | PETER KUEBECK Sentinel Staff Writer
PERRYSBURG - A tie vote derailed an expected appointment to an empty council seat Tues [ ... ]