|To the Editor: Decides to vote against Issue 2||| Print ||
|Written by Wallace L. Pretzer|
|Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:58|
Having grown up on a family farm, I was pleased to read Vickie Askins' letter (Oct. 7) regarding Issue 2. This is not the first time that I have read her thoughtful letters regarding farm issues, especially regarding her opposition to factory farms. I have also opposed them because of their large-scale developments lacking meaningful controls.
On my country route to Dublin, Ohio, recently, I saw many Yes for Issue 2 signs, usually on family farms. Thinking that the arguments for the proposal as well as its general plan could, as Vickie has indicated, be good, I thought of voting for it. Yet I was also skeptical of "the unchecked power" embodied in the proposal.
With the help of Vicki's points, I now know that I will vote against Issue 2. A new law applying to farmers should not be an amendment to the state constitution. This one favors large agribusiness interests that often neglect rules on animal welfare. I noted that organizations like the Ohio Farmers Union, the League of Women Voters, and Ohio's Sierra Club oppose Issue 2. As the election draws nearer, it will be interesting to read just how newspaper editors articulate their positions.
Wallace L. Pretzer
Front Page Stories
|Health positions shuffled
12/13/2013 | ALEX ASPACHER Sentinel Staff Writer
With a laundry list challenges facing the health center in 2014 following its receipt [ ... ]
|Lake burial index to be digitized|
12/13/2013 | DEBBIE ROGERS Sentinel Staff Writer
MILLBURY - Thousands of Lake Township Cemetery records buried on index cards will begi [ ... ]