To the Editor: BG resident criticizes how city dealt with landlord
Written by Sally Medbourn Mott   
Saturday, 08 August 2009 08:01
The ever-fluctuating vagaries of the city's "how many unrelated people can live in a rental house" laws continue to confound us landlords.
 If only Brad Waltz (fined $45,000 for renting to 4 instead of 3 unrelated tenants, S-T, July 22, page 4) had flown his 4 "unrelated" tenants out to Las Vegas for some quickie marriages, they would have then been "related" and he would've avoided the $45,000 non-related tenant fine.
 Even more unsettling (and quite scary) was the city's deceitful and mean-spirited approach to alerting Mr. Waltz about the situation:  His tenants " . . . were taken to the police station, forced to sign affidavits swearing they would not tell me I was caught. That way my $500/day fine kept on, for six weeks (resulting in a $45,000 fine)."
 Doesn't this smack just a little of entrapment?
 Entrapment isn't legal, is it?
 And surely the parents of these students were horrified that their children were dealt with in such a bullying manner.
 Maybe the salaries of the rental-police depend on how long rental-violation fees are allowed to run up before landlords are notified?
 Like snow-shoveling police salaries depend on how quickly citizens can be fined (before the snow has a chance to melt)?
 Like police salaries depend on how many speeding tickets are issued?
Sally Medbourn Mott
Bowling Green
 

Front Page Stories

Saving the world through rain forests
04/22/2014 | DAVID DUPONT Sentinel Staff Writer
article thumbnail

Saving the planet may come down to helping poor women in Kenya cook supper more effici [ ... ]


Eastwood teachers make new school pitch
04/22/2014 | MARIE THOMAS BAIRD Sentinel Education Editor
article thumbnail

PEMBERVILLE - Eastwood elementary teachers made their case Monday for a new K-5 school [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles