2012YearPhotos

Perrysburg eyes 13.1-mill levy PDF Print E-mail
Written by PETER KUEBECK Sentinel Staff Writer   
Tuesday, 24 July 2012 09:28
Perrysburg_rotator
PERRYSBURG - Voting under a cloud of concern, the Perrysburg Board of Education decided unanimously Monday to place an emergency replacement operating levy on the November ballot.
"This is our shot at securing an educational system in Perrysburg that works well, works efficiently, and takes into consideration a wide variety of interests and priorities," said Board President Barry Van Hoozen.
If approved, the levy will collect 13.14 mills, or about $10 million, in the first year, increasing by 1.28 mills, or $975,000, in each of the remaining three years. By the end of the levy in 2016, the rate would be 16.98 mills, or about $13 million. About $46 million will be collected in total during the levy's four years.
On a $200,000 home, this means a cost increase to current property taxes of about $26 per month each year. Superintendent Tom Hosler likened this to the price of a family pizza night.
The current levy, voted into place in 2008, collects 9.95 mills, or $7.6 million.
The atmosphere at Monday's meeting was uncharacteristically somber as the board and Hosler discussed the levy. Two choices were initially placed before board members to consider, with the administration favoring the second, slightly more conservative, option, which was ultimately chosen.
Hosler, though noting he did not wish to scare residents, painted a somewhat discomfiting picture of the consequences if the levy should fail.
"If the levy fails, we will have higher class sizes," he said, going on to say "we will have fewer offerings, we will have a reduction in faculty and staff."
"We'll have fewer extracurriculars, I think we'll lose a little bit of the esteem" the city has as a community.
"People begin to leave, students begin to leave," he said. "You begin that downward spiral."
Determining the form and amount of the levy was a months-long, painstaking process for the administration, and statements made by board members prior to the  vote reflected this. Walter Edinger noted his concern that the amount asked for in the levy would prove too little for the district, while Mark Schoenlein worried that the size of the millage increase might be too much and not accurately reflect the districts needs.
At the end of fiscal year 2016, the district would have a $500,000 carryover in its general fund, little more than half the amount needed to cover a single bimonthly pay period, said District Treasurer and CFO Matt Feasel. A $3.2 million carryover is optimal.
In his presentation to the board, Hosler noted that the next step will be promoting the levy and getting the word out to the public by a variety of means.
"No one wants to hear about raising their taxes," he said. However, "I think with this particular levy, with this replacement levy, I think we can continue to be that point of pride for this community."
 

Comments  

 
# 2012-07-24 12:54
Live within you're budget like everyone else. All factions, both public and private sector, are doing more with less. Get on board with that line of thinking instead of constantly asking the residents for a hand out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 15:44
Correct, everyone must live within their budget. However, it seems they ARE living within their budget--the article states this is a replacement levy.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 13:19
No way.......................
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 14:06
If this levy should pass, at year 4 the monthly increase is $104 a month. Now folks THAT is serious money!
May I humbly suggest some cost cutting.

1. REDUCING holidays to 10 per year.
2. REDUCING sick-time to 7 days per year with no carry over to the next.
3. implement a short term( 12 weeks max) disability insurance policy (for minor illness) 100% pay, paid for by employer.
4. implement a long term disability insurance policy(for major illness), paid for by employee.
5. Do away with RETIRE/REHIRE and therefore put recently graduated teachers to WORK !
Yes I know, STATE LAW WILL HAVE TO CHANGE.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 17:01
Even if all these measures could/would be implemented..we would still be under water. Thank our Governor for cutting school funding. Living within a budget is all well and good..until the budget gets cut this drastically.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 15:46
...or am I the one misreading it?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 16:37
This is an outrageous request.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 21:38
really thinking about grandpa and grandma
and all those with no job. Shows what happens when you put people in charge and pay them to much,they soon forget the rest of the world.A quick look at the per capita income would tell whether this has any chance of passage.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 11:25
$104 per month in year 4! Think about that Perrysburg voters. That's 4 "pizza nights" a month, poor Marco's. I am voting no, there has to be a more cost effective solution.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 11:27
I'd rather have pizza than overpaid and over staffed administrators that have no sense of stewardship of tax payer dollars. No way on this one Tom.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 14:03
One, stop calling it a replacement levy, that is misleading. In the average tax payer's head, a replacement levy would reflect in no increase to our property taxes. Let us not forget a few things

1. We already pay a separate school only income tax in addition to our property tax.

2. People, including myself chose this area over other places like Sylvania, largely due to the cheaper property taxes.

3. And what I consider to be the most important fact.....the city of Perrysburg has made it their goal to annex any home or field under the sun. They have also allowed the building of too many apartment complexes. This has strained the school system and the growth has outpaced the revenue.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 15:48
Seriously?! As someone who bought my first house this year in Perrysburg, I can say that we chose it over Maumee as the taxes were more favorable. Cut down on other things like every other district is. How about pay-to-participate extracurricular s? Don't get me wrong I think that it is important to keep our educators but does the levy need to increase every year? Cut other things and a slight increase I have no problem with.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-26 07:20
It is time to stand up and say no to this irresponsible school board and administration. Please, sheep of Perrysburg, band together and say no to wasteful spending........VOTE NO!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Local cities see growth
05/23/2013 | JAN LARSON McLAUGHLIN Sentinel County Editor
article thumbnail

While many other cities in the region are watching their populations shrink, Wood Coun [ ... ]


Perrysburg at odds on member for council
05/23/2013 | PETER KUEBECK Sentinel Staff Writer
article thumbnail

PERRYSBURG - A tie vote derailed an expected appointment to an empty council seat Tues [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles
Sentinel-Tribune Copyright 2010
viagra online 車保険