 |
| Chrystal Thompson at Board of Elections this morning. (Photo: J.D. Pooley/Sentinel-Tribune) |
The crowd spilled out into the hallway, waiting to hear the fate of the Bowling Green anti-discrimination ordinances - a race too close to call on election night. When the numbers were reported, the silence was broken by cheers. And a couple women, now with new-found support in their community, openly kissed and hugged. Both ordinances passed, one with 52.67 percent of the vote and the other with 51.65 percent. "I feel a little overwhelmed," said Kay Chapman, who worked on the campaign. "My faith in the people of Bowling Green has been restored and I guess it's time to let the healing begin."
As of election night, without the provisional ballots being counted, BG Ordinance 7905 was passing 4,104 to 4,080, and Ordinance 7906 was losing 4,003 to 4,119. But after the counting of the provisional ballots, likely many of them from BGSU students, Ordinance 7905 passed 4,767 to 4,284 and Ordinance 7906 passed 4,635 to 4,338. The margins are wide enough that no automatic recount is required. Those opposed to the ordinances said the close margin is notable, considering the concerted efforts to get BGSU students to support the issues. "It's extremely close," said Crystal Thompson, spokesperson for the anti-ordinance effort. "We were extremely close considering we were outspent by eight times." Thompson said the earlier numbers, which showed both ordinances being soundly defeated, better reflected the feelings of true BG residents. "The city clearly didn't want it," Thompson said this morning. However, Kim Welter, campaign manager for ONE BG, said the victory is not due purely to student voters. "I don't think most of BG believes gay and transgender people ought to be discriminated against," she said. Ordinance 7905 forbids landlords from evicting or refusing to rent to people because of their sexual orientation. Ordinance 7906 makes it unlawful for businesses to fire, refuse to hire, or refuse to serve a person because of sexual orientation. Council passed the ordinances in August 2009, but the laws were put on hold when an opposition group submitted referendum petitions to put the issues up for a city-wide vote. Mary Vollmar, an opponent of the ordinances, said this morning that the new laws are just the start of a deterioration of traditional values. The ordinances, she said, are the first step to dissolve the sanctity of one man-one woman marriages in Ohio. "People, especially young adults, need to wake up," Vollmar said. But Welter objected to that logic, saying 17 other Ohio cities already have similar ordinances in place - many for over a decade - yet marriage laws in the state have not been changed. The ordinances, she said, simply provide a way to handle discrimination issues locally. "It's a way to give people an option if they choose to report discrimination," she said. The campaign brought topics into public discussion that before had been hushed. Gay and transgender community members talked about discrimination they have faced in the past. "We're all so proud of every person who stood up and spoke out," said Darlene Bevelhymer, treasurer of the ONE BG campaign. "This is a day to be proud of our community and to be proud of every person who stepped up to be part of this decision," said Jane Rosser, ONE BG chairperson. And now the healing must begin, since the campaign split some members of the community. Rosser said it is up to BG residents to make the ordinances work and make the city a welcoming community by reaching out to everyone - "regardless of what yard sign they had in front of their house." On election night, when it initially appeared the ordinances had been soundly defeated, Thompson said her organization would next target city council members who passed the ordinances. "They're next," she said. "We're voting them out - all of them." She added that Mike Frost, the one councilmember to vote against the ordinances, would not be targeted. "We'll let Frost stay." However, this morning, Thompson said any future action by her organization is yet unknown. "We'll wait and see," she said.
The Wood County Board of Elections this morning announced that Ordinances 7905 and 7906 in Bowling Green were approved. Ordinance 7905 — 4,765 yes; 4284 no. Ordinance 7906 — 4,635 yes; 4,338 no. The margin of victory is sufficient to avoid an automatic recount.
 |
| BGSU students and ONE campaign volunteers Raisa Mathis, left, and Michelle Moomau look over electioin results. (Photo: J.D. Pooley/Sentinel-Tribune) |
|
Comments
Get a grip, 'concerned parent'. More like, 'misinformed parent' or 'buys into the scare tactics parent'.
cause animosity.
You remind me of some other folk who think it's "family values" to keep women barefoot and pregnant and put black back in the back of the bus...
There has *never* been an incident of a transsexual or crossdresser assaulting someone in the ladies toilet, and even if there were, they would *still* be in violation of the law!
The fact is, there's more of a chance of the *transgender* person being assaulted, than the other way around.
I also like how no one paid attention to the clauses that also included pregnant women and veterans. Glad to know that people hate gays enough to also hate their veterans and women who would give birth to the next generation (and hopefully have the sense to tell them that the reason they're on the streets is because someone is so full of hate that they want to tell people how to live their lives when it is none of their business, and that their child should never hate anyone for being who they are)
You really, really don't get it, do you? These ordinances have NOTHING to do with bathrooms. You have been lied to. Do some basic research and stop being so terrified of everything.
Most molestation does not happen in a public place. Discrimination apparently does though. You should be ashamed of yourself and god will punish you for being a bigot!
It is your right to leave bowling green. Leave it to the loving accepting christian's who follow Jesus's true message.
If this is all you have to worry about in life, you're quite fortunate. The odds of coming across a crossdresser in a restroom are infinitesimal. The odds of finding a crossdressing child molester is beyond remote. You would be better served worrying about that “funny uncle” in your family.
A VERY good reason for women to take a self-defense course. Heaven help a cross-dresser that comes into a bathroom where my wife is at...IF she doesn't put his lights out, I will when he comes out!
It's not hard to see how these laws were passed..many so-called Christian churches now condone homosexuals in their clergy. IF you attend one of these churches (shame on you), have them show you in the Bible where it is OK...they can't do it.
The BOE were *required* by law to verify those ballots within ten days, plus allow for the mail to deliver any ballot sent overseas with a postmark before 7:30pm Nov. 2nd.
If that's true, then there is no law that says it's illegal, and therefore it isn't illegal. Maybe in poor taste, but not illegal. But I don't buy your premise in the first place!
You can spew as much bile towards me as you like, sweetie. But if such invective causes you or someone else to assault me, then it's not... repeat, NOT protected by the First Amendment!
I would also like to remind you that people once used personal religious beliefs as justification to deny racial minorities *their* equal rights under our *secular* Constitution -- including the right to vote and marry!
I respectfully suggest you educate yourself on the ins and outs of the Constitution, for you seem unable to fathom the fact that religion is irrelevant when it comes to the rights guaranteed by our *secular* Constitution.
It IS a Christian's duty to discern between right and wrong. It is also a right to NOT condone sin. That said, all Christians should still treat others the way they want to be treated! That does not mean you can't voice your opinion or stand up for what it right.
From the Christian perspective, being a Muslim or a Jew is sinful. From the Islamic perspective, being a Christian or a Jew is sinful. From the Jewish perspective, being Christian or Muslim is sinful. If you are willing to rent to someone of a different faith, then you are a hypocrite.
What if I worshiped a golden onion? Would you rent to me?
What if I eat shellfish - also a sin - would you rent to me?
Probably you've never read the Ohio tenants rights. They don't include you. Good thing.
I think God would want you to love them and find a way to bring them closer to Him. Leave the judgement to God
I completely agree. The ignorant discrimination of people who are blind to anything but stereotypes absolutely disgusts me. Particularly those individuals who don't quite understand the American system of separating church from state. Even as a Catholic, I find dragging religious beliefs into this situation to be offensive.
Jesus rocked the boat so should we. Jesus was radically inclusive we have emulated that with the passaged of 7905 and 7906. We have put our laws in line with the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles. While Mary Volmer contends traditional Christian morals are being broke down I contend another questionable moral value (or more appropriately a lack there of)joined the ranks of slavery, womens sufferage, racial discrimination and now sexual orientation discrimination got resolved in the rule of law as the framers of the constitution envisioned. We are a better Nation as a result of what happened in our electorate.
No, excuse me, they make bigots "LEGALLY ACCOUNTABLE" for their discrimination and hatred against humanity, all humanity. How many years out are we already from the first "hate crime" legal acknowledgement in this country? Get with the right thing to do, the people have voted, and rightly so!
The *first* thing which happens is *arbitration*! Multiple attempts! By local *volunteers* at NO cost to the city!
Arbitration!
Arbitration!
Arbitration!
This is to save *both* sides time and money by not having to go to a lawyer or wade through the bureaucracy of either the EEOC and/or the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
Removing "gender expression" doesn't protect privacy; it turns private citizens-- such as transgender people-- into objects of public witch hunts.
Straight women who may love wearing flannel and jeans and has short hair may get mistaken for being lesbian. A male who prefers wearing tops which look more like a blouse may get mistaken for being gay or transgender.
I've seen men who have more earrings than the average woman... that's a gender expression.
Ahh..another warm, fuzzy comment from one of those who are happy to have created an environment where all are accepted.
and to Old Fogey- are you familiar with the hate that has been continuously spread by "snapperhead"? He has insulted and threatened LGBT people and their supporters on a regular basis. Please don't be so quick to judge where people are coming from.
IF you haven't had this worry before, you are quite naive...at least now you might be able to tell...
I challenge any of my fellow Christians to present a cogent argument as to how the recognition of all of God's children as worthy of love (His and thus that required of all Christians) will somehow affect heterosexual relationships and marriage.
Scripture tells us that God does not turn away any who love Him.
IF they truly love Him, they will turn away from their sin and ask foregiveness. To continue sinning is no less than spitting in our Lord's face and complete denial of His Saving Grace.
Hopefully this can be put back on the ballot in the summer when brainwashed kids will be out of town at their real homes.
First, the BGCA IS exempt as they are a *private* school, same as St. Al's!
Second, it's PRO-business, as it expands the base from which a business can attract customers and tenets!
Third, the voting schedule is up to the Secretary of State, NOT the local BOE! Go educate yourself, fool.
Second, are you saying there are no elections held from mid May - Aug? Really? Hopefully something to repeal this garbage can get onto a ballot when the out of students are back at their real homes.
Third, not sure how you can hint this frivolous ordinance as being even remotely pro-business. It's just another unneeded hurdle in trying bring employment here.
For example, the petitions to put the ordinances on the ballot were filed in October of last year. There was a primary back in May, and Ohio had special elections in August, but it was ineligible for a vote at that time. Municipal elections are only held at certain times during certain years.
It's the height of prejudice to demand local issues only be voted on in the summer.
Sorry, but this is just plain sick. I'm very thankful I don't have to claim BG as my hometown. Next thing you know, murder will be okay and lawful -- since the Bible is so wrong and everything.
Sorry, but this is just plain sick. I'm very thankful I don't have to claim BG as my hometown. Next thing you know, murder will be okay and lawful -- since the Bible is so wrong and everything.
I'm sure somewhere there is a list of businesses who opposed these ordinances. You could try to frequent only those places. Maybe if you're lucky that trend will spread. There could be a palpable divide in town.
Perhaps the groups could start wearing arm bands to designate themselves. Then we could avoid each other on the street.
That's fine. I prefer to dine and shop with those who accept all people, regardless of their personal choices.
Doesnt sound like you accept "all people". Maybe just people that share your beliefs ? See what I'm getting at ?
Oh and I've asked a million times and never get an answer. Since you obviously live your life completely by Biblical rule, do you work on Sabbath? Cover your hair in church? Stay silent in church? believe in owning slaves? How about selling your own daughter? We'll start with these and I'll get back to you after that with a few more. THANKS!
Are you going to boycott cities who refuse to discriminate against co-habitating couples, who allow drunkenness, or allow women to work outside the home and have women ministers and lay leaders?
This is the 21st century, darling, not the 18th, nor the 10th, or even the First! Have fun trying to find a town who follows your narrow-minded bigotry!
There's a difference between saying there's no god, and rejecting current gods. Until you have proof, I have no reason to believe any religion is correct.
But if the God you believe in is so real, he can clearly fix the whole 'people not believing in him' thing by letting us know he actually exists. He's all powerful, right? So it's a perfectly simple task for him. I'll believe if he does this. Doesn't necessarily mean I'll worship, but I'll believe.
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.
Hope you've got good snow tires! I too thought this was a joke, I couldn't believe it was even an issue! Or, in the year 2010 ANYONE would publicly humiliate themselves by promoting bigotry. Unbelievable! I'm grateful I live where this is not challenged, and my life isn't filled with it. People would be publicly humiliated to even have to hear this!
P.S. Dear C.P.: Transgendered women might have been using rest rooms next to your children all along, just about anywhere. How would you know? What a ridiculous thing to obsess over.
P.S.S. Dear Ahmad, So you wouldn't rent to fornicators? Adulterers? How about people who just take God's name in vain? I'm sure you can find some nice rental property elsewhere where you can discriminate all you want. You are still free to practice your own religion. The only "right" you're giving up is wanting to make more money.
Traditional values of whom? Not everyone believes in discrimination and ignorance. There are several mainstream Denominations that not only accept LGBT people as members, but also ordain LGBT clergy.
I think there was a typo in Old Fogey's comment. He or she meant to say that close to half of the *biased, hypocritical* BG residents were not in favor of them.
No, I didn't mean that at all, but nice try. The election came out as One BG wanted. Why still so much venom?
These same kind of people believe that a woman shouldn't have the power over their reproductive freedom, who believed that two people of different skin colors couldn't marry, who believed that segregation was sacred, who discriminated against Jews, Muslims, and other Christians by required prayers in public schools, etcetera -- all based on their *personal* religious beliefs.
This is why the Establishment Clause is in the Constitution, and the practice of church/state separation. Our Constitution is *secular*, and is like that on purpose!
Agreed fails to comprehend that no one is *given* a job due to what they are! There are NO quotas in the ordinances, Agreed... NONE!
Furthermore, how is insuring the fact that ALL citizens of BG are treated *equally* before the law (which is secular, btw!), denying someone else their rights?
You *do* know, don't you that what someone's personal religious beliefs has no standing when it comes to following non-discrimination laws, right?
As to your assertions regarding rights, I'll say it again -- how is guaranteeing that *everyone* is treated equally taking away someone else's rights?
Of course if that other person is a bigot and prejudiced towards a minority, then I can understand them whining and throwing a tantrum like a spoilt child being told they're going to have to start sharing.
The same whining came when the courts started ruling that the rights of religious and racial minorities along with women were covered under the Fourteenth Amendment, and now it's time LGBTs are covered under the same Constitution.
If I owned a slew of rental properties, I'd love to be able to say "I won't rent to anyone who attends Dayspring", or "I won't rent to heterosexuals" but I wouldn't.
One year, I decided to test Cracker Barrel back when they were openly anti-LGBT and apply for a job as a dishwasher. The manager had to go back to his office (most likely to look at the file they were required to keep for any names who held pro-LGBT views), and he came back, saying I was over-qualified.
I told him someone who worked at Blanchard Valley Industries (Hancock County's version of Wood Lane) was over-qualified, and I knew the reason *why* I was not hired.
Did you sue them?
Now if Gary Thompson adapts his business and declares it to be open *only* to churches, then he has that right, but he still would be subject to laws banning religious discrimination.
There are exemptions to the housing ordinance, Len dear... try reading the ordinance and finding out for yourself what the exemptions are.
This has NOTHING to do with sexual predators, stay on topic. This is about making sure someone is hired/rented to based on qualifications, rather than gender/sexuality. These laws have been on the books in other Ohio cities for several years, and the world keeps spinning. If you hire based on merit, than you have nothing to worry about.
But just to let you know... the services provided by the city (fire, police, EMS, streets, street repair, snow removal, water and sewer, ad infinitum IS socialism!
As I mentioned in an earlier letter to the editor, an employer should only be concerned as to whether or not an applicant is qualified for the job being advertised. A landlord should only be concerned with whether or not a tenant's money is green or whether or not their check bounced. Focusing on whether your prospective employee or renter is gay or straight has nothing to do with their ability to work or pay rent.
I get your meaning, dear. You want to be able to discriminate based on beliefs you feel are immoral.
Well, it was once thought that an interracial or unmarried couple were immoral too, and our society has evolved past those petty prejudices. you're just going to have to get used to the fact that LGBT Americans have rights too, my dear.
Gay bars, gay church's gay businesses and future establishments. They can and will be paid to present a heterosexual life style while they work. They are also no longer confined to the street side walk as long as they do business in an establishment. No discrimination against sexual orientation means just that, everyones included.
They have been denied entrance to the church across the street from the P.S.. No more all they need do is put a penny check in the plate and they cannot be denied any service anyone else is allowed there. They can preach whatever message they feel. If a blatant H.S. must be accepted any blatant... must be. The town has the potential for some very ugly outsiders to have "fun" in town and all legal. Maybe if that does people will begin to understand personal freedom. A bar! Jesus served wine inorder to preach. He didn't have the law behind him.
As Bugs Bunny would say "Watta maroon!"
The sign at First Pres. is "Christ Welcomes All." What Gargie is saying in shorthand (I think) is that due to the ordinances this now should force the church to admit those who show up opposed to other groups who have been allowed entrance, explicitly GLTB. This is nonsense. Not only are religious groups exempt from the ordinances, but giving this example shows basic confusion about the distinction between civic and religious life in a secular democracy.
To all the haters: if you wanted a place where people shared your values (aka bigotry) you should probably not have chosen to live in a town with a liberal arts university in the middle of it. Artsy college kids tend to live in the present day, not in the stone age.
oh believe me, when the time is right, im fleeing this liberal-dominatin', tree-huggin', hippy-infested town.
and you wonder why people leave small towns in droves as soon as they can...small towns, small minds
I don't wonder, it's WHY I left. I even sold my rental too! I refused to pay taxes any longer to a community so bigoted. And, yes, I voted. I lived there and owned several properties. I do practice what I preach and now live in a very tolerant community. Not an ivory tower, like I've been accused of, but an equal tower, and I'm not even GAY! The discrimination disgusted me. I shop elsewhere myself now too, and pay taxes to another State and community. I find relief that I don't have to listen to bigotry in the grocery aisle, and everywhere else, it is refreshing to say the least!
This was nothing more but a vote on lewd,and crude homosexual behavior.Nothing more nothing less.
This bill was passed so that members of the community are hired based on how well they can perform a job, and find housing based on their ability to pay. No more, no less.
If you and the business can't reach a settlement after *multiple attempts, *then* you have the right to have the EEOC and the Ohio Civil Rights Commission hear your case.
Once you begin a business, you open yourself up to the laws of the country, state, and city.
This means you're required to follow lots of laws on safety, access, pay, taxes, and a myriad of other laws.
Some of those laws are on non-discrimination. This means you cannot under limited circumstances deny service to *anyone* who walks in your door... *period*! Those signs which say "we reserve the the right to refuse service" better have a valid and *legal* reason to deny said service.
If it's a place like the Corner Grill and have been burned by certain customers, or they're dressed in a way (no shirt, no shoes, no service) then they have that right. Otherwise, they can't refuse.
I guess another thing has changed too, now all the LGBT folks are free to be themselves and you have to hide your bigotry that you used to wear as a badge of honor...
Way to go BG indeed!! I love living in a progressive town! Thanks voters!!
So did anyone ever find out that you were gay?
It turns BG into a Gay Pride only community.Those not in the lifestyle are to be displaced in the future.This vote has started the legal take over.You better get used to the new wave.Heterosexuals will become obsolete in this new elite community.
AGREED!!! Way to hit the nail on the head Snapper! Just like plain white, hard working, tax paying, law abiding men and women will be obsolete and in the minority because EVERYONE else MUST have THEIR way! Bravo for being honest! And before anyone gets cute, I am NOT a bigot..I am SICK & TIRED of the fact that I CAN'T live MY life the way I WANT TO!!
What about all the people in the gay community who have put their blood, sweat, and tears into having a normal life who are continuously discriminated against? Are they less important and therefore not worth protecting? I'm just trying to understand why it's ok to hurt these people so business owners can discriminate as they please.
What downright scares me, though, is that these type of laws have been around for 50+ years. Do you also hate it that you would have to serve blacks, muslims or catholics in your someday, dream business?
Now there are comments about telling people to leave and they are not welcome here, take your business elsewhere or don't use a BG business ??
Please tell me how this is good for BG.
Yes, OUR COMMUNITY, is divided on this issue and yes emotions are high, but does that equate to hate ??
I challenge EVERYONE who posted a negative comment on here to retract it.
Everyone here knows someone who voted againts the way you voted. No matter which way they voted, they are still good people.
Who is with me ???
So keep your nose out of other people's business, Newman...or should I say Mrs. Kravitz. There should be enough things within your own life to keep you busy without worrying about how others live their life. Oh - I forgot - you have to "have a life" in order to do that.
Extremely difficult to keep your nose out of people's business when they keep shoving their business down your throat and forcing it to be an ordinance. It's everywhere no matter what it is and everyone must accept eceryone and the way they live. I say accept the way I live and I will accept the way you live...but keep your crap out of my life and I will keep my crap out of yours. Oh wait, the only way to keep me and my family from anything offensive I will have to move to a remote area, no electricity, no tv, radio, no contact with another human being ever again, no newsprint..wow. So how many of you are going to tell me to start packing like you have with others who would rather not live where they do not agree with the majority? Hmm?
The FIRST step is arbitration! The *second* step is arbitration! In fact is, there are *repeated* attempts at resolving the dispute *without* having to file a lawsuit, or contacting either the EEOC and/or the OCRC.
Does someone from ONE BG have to knock on your door, hand you a copy of the ordinance and point to where it says "arbitration" for you to realize that fact?
Who does the arbitration?
Since you obviously don't know a thing about binding arbitration, I suggest you Google it. It's not a "free ride", darling. The compaintent has to provide evidence, just as if was a trial.
The ordinances are not about lawyers- I don't even know where you're getting that idea. They are about protecting people from discrimination in housing and employment. It's a very simple concept, though lots of confusing messages have been sent out from the NO campaign. I can say that with the ordinances passing, people who often times are targets of hatred and discrimination feel a bit safer in our town. Why are you truly so against this?
"I will no longer spend my hard earned money in a community that is against GOD and believes that homosexuality is ok."
WRATH!!! One of the Seven deadly sins! And you women say you are God fearing!
Could you site for me one passage in the bible in which God, Jesus, Allah, ect.. Says that we should not love and be gentle to ALL our neighbors?
The other Sins include:
Lust- I hope that you never look at your significant other in a sexual way.
Gluttony-I hope you eat a balanced diet and are thin.
Greed-I hope you have never wanted to win the lottery.
Envy-Don't look at your neighbors house and think how it is nicer than yours.
You should be careful of what you say.
Matthew 7:1 "Do not judge, or you too will be judged.
or perhaps
Romans 2:1 You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.
EXACTLY my point. The two women I quoted say that they are seeking revenge on a town and specific people of this town and are doing so because of their love for God. They accuse others of sinning, yet they are living in sin themselves. As for my sins...well I would rather stand there on my judgement day having wished to have won the lottery than standing there having lived my life with hate in my heart towards someone because of who they love or how they dress and using Gods word as reason to justify my hate.
Should it be illegal to fire someone because they are a democrat and the owner of the establishment is a republican or if they are a Ohio State fan and the owner is a Michigan fan?
Where does the line get drawn?
First, you need to remember that in the beginning, the colonies were in fact 12 defacto theocracies, except for Rhode Island. This meant only male members of the colony's official religion could be jurors, run for office, etc. That's why Article XI of the Constitution bans religious tests, and the Establishment Clause of the First bans any public entity from naming an official religion or recognize one religion over any other. Those were our first non-discrimination laws.
As long as your business is open to the public, then you're subject to every non-discrimination laws on the books, and has been since the country began.
What I would like to hear from the religious zealots in these comments is whether they think religious affiliation is a choice. That's already protected in hiring and housing...
So, is that a fair trade?
My best stuff is getting censored..And its G-rated..
It's not necessarily worse, but it IS out in the open. Maybe now we can begin to talk and reach a stage of meaningful discourse. We may never agree totally, but maybe we can begin to understand each other and realize that it's not a black and white situation, that there's no right and wrong, just differences of opinion. Which is possibly the most "American" thing that could happen. And, yes, there still exists hatred and fear of many groups, most recently LGBTs, Muslims, and Hispanics. 80 years ago, all of these groups would have been oppressed, in addition to Irish and Italians. Progress is possible only through understanding and tolerance. We can do this.
I'd like to meet up with Justice Scalia one day and send him back in time to those days -- I wonder what his attitude would be like if *he* were oppressed and discriminated against dayafterdayafte rdayafterday....
RSS feed for comments to this post.