2012YearPhotos

New dog law adds bite PDF Print E-mail
Written by JAN LARSON McLAUGHLIN Sentinel County Editor   
Friday, 25 May 2012 09:58
Sat_Feature_Snyder_rotator
File photo. Wood County Dog Warden Andrew Snyder.
Ohio's new dog laws rank the temperament of dogs based on their behavior, not on their breed.
Wood County Dog Warden Andrew Snyder recently met with the county commissioners to review the changes which went into effect earlier this week.
Under the old laws, pit bull type breeds were automatically deemed "dangerous." Under the new law, there are three categories of dogs, some which come with new requirements for their owners.
According to Snyder, if a dog meets the definition, the dog warden or law enforcement officer is required to designate a dog as a nuisance, dangerous, and/or vicious. All unprovoked dog bites will result in the dog's automatic designation as a dangerous or vicious dog.
The three new classifications of dogs are:
• "Nuisance" means a dog that without provocation and while off the premises of its owner, keeper, or harborer has chased or approached a person in either a menacing fashion or an apparent attitude of attack or has attempted to bite or otherwise endanger any person.
• "Dangerous" means a dog that, without provocation, has done any of the following: caused injury, other than killing or serious injury, to any person; killed another dog; has been found running loose three or more times. That means any dog, whose owner is cited three times for it running loose, will be declared "dangerous."
• "Vicious" means a dog that, without provocation, has killed or caused serious injury to any person.
Snyder explained to the commissioners that since 2002, nearly 1,500 dog bites have been recorded in the county. That includes 131 in 2010, 105 in 2001, and 35 for the first four months of this year.
Wood County Administrator Andrew Kalmar said the changes to the law will be far reaching.
"Before it was just a single breed," Kalmar said of the dangerous dog classifications. "Initially, I would expect this will cause some additional activity."
The law is now really encouraging dog owners to be responsible for their pets, he said.
"That's what it really comes down to," Kalmar said.
Dog owners whose dogs have been deemed a nuisance, dangerous, or vicious will receive notice from the dog warden or law enforcement.
"Owners can challenge the designation of a dog at a hearing," Snyder said. To get a hearing, the owner must file the request in writing within 10 days of the designation to the municipal or county court that has territorial jurisdiction over the residence of the dog's owner.
The owner of a "dangerous" or "vicious" dog must comply with the following requirements:
• Post signs indicating the presence of a dangerous or vicious dog
• Spay or neuter the dog
• Microchip the dog
• Obtain and maintain current rabies vaccinations
• May have to obtain specific liability insurance coverage
• Must register the dangerous or vicious dog annually
The required registration of a dangerous or vicious dog with the Wood County Auditor costs $50 annually. This is in addition to the regular annual dog registration and license fee of $14, or $28 if purchased after the required deadline.
Confinement of the dangerous or vicious dog must also be in accordance with new, stricter requirements. People who are convicted of or plead guilty to certain felony offenses may not own or reside in a residence with a dangerous dog or an unspayed or unneutered dog older than 12 weeks of age.  
Anyone wanting more information on the new law may contact the Wood County Dog Shelter at (419) 354-9242 or visit www.co.wood.oh.us.
 

Comments  

 
# 2012-05-25 12:51
This seems like a positive change. But, a dog will be labeled as dangerous for running loose three times? The only sense that makes is that it results in more costs for the owner and more money going to BG/the state. Imagine that.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-25 20:17
Yippee. Just as it should be!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-25 23:49
Anyone who has a loved one suffer an animal attack will tell you this is too little ... they should have done more and automatically required pit bulls to be tagged and insured.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-26 10:36
Try to imagine walking your dog on a leash...and having another dog just running loose ...doing whatever...could this be a dangerous situation for you and your dog ? I think it makes good sense to try to motivate these other dog owners to keep their dogs either inside or on some kind of restaint in the yard...whether is is a chain or a fenced yard...an dog running loose is a definate problem to all of us...think about it. And what motivated people more than having to part with their money ! ?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-25 23:47
Pit Bulls are a bad joke and should have been their own category and eradicated. Not sure why people insist on defending such a dangerous breed. At minimum all dangerous dog owners should have to carry a rider on their home and renters insurance to cover the damage their vicious animals will do.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-26 02:57
I am glad it is not breed specific now, but like Tasha said, just because it gets loose doesn't make it a dangerous dog. Our one dog has gotten loose a couple times, but she never went after anyone, just tried to get into their vehicle or went to their door...I don't see what makes a dog dangerous just for running loose...weird, I could see it if it went after someone as if to attack
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-26 10:39
It's not ok for a dog to be running loose. Your dog is not EVERY dog. Some dogs are not NICE.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-26 13:53
While I appreciate the new change, I still find it disgusting that people such as John will lump all dogs of specific breed as vicious because of a bad experience with one dog. Do you know how the dog was treated John? Did you see the environment in which it was raised? Can I put you in a bad situation, and force you to do things, and treat you in a bad nature, and see if you do not become cold, bitter, and aggressive?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-27 20:04
I am very happy about the changes in the law. We who have had pit bulls see first hand how wonderful they can be. I am angry that people that dont know still run their mouths about a breed of dog they have no clue about. I would like to also say to rental companies and such out there dont false advertise by putting your a equal opportunity enterprise when your not. Forbidding pit bulls is not giving them an opportunity. I had a apt complex tell me which advertized that , they loved large dogs, but when i said pit she was like "Oh no way" ignorant people out their are what makes me angry. I friend of mines son was bit by a jack russell last week, are jack russels going to be forbidden in the apt complexes now??? are they????
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-05-29 08:08
I think, at the heart of all of this, no matter the breed, the size, what have you, people need to be responsible pet owners. If you have a rescue dog with an unknown past, get it some obedience training...If you have a dog that has bitten someone or who acts aggressively, put a muzzle on it and be sure you have proper insurance. Having a dog is a responsibility, and ALL dog owners should act responsibly for them, and be held accountable for their behavior. Unfortunately, many dog owners feel so strongly about their breed of animal that they don't take into account their animal "could" be aggressive because of its past. However, no matter how well you treat it in adulthood, if it was abused, neglected, or trained to act aggressively as a puppy, that behavior is not going to "go away" by simply loving the animal.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Photographer finds picture perfect career
05/18/2013 | JACK CARLE Sentinel Sports Editor
article thumbnail

Elizabeth Lee. (Photo: J.D. Pooley/Sentinel-Tribune) A passion for photography ha [ ... ]


Pemberville woman fights incurable disease
05/18/2013 | PETER KUEBECK Sentinel Staff Writer
article thumbnail

Karen Williams talks about scleroderma with her husband Charles at their home in Pemberv [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles
Sentinel-Tribune Copyright 2010
cialis online車保険