2012YearPhotos

Former home of BGSU presidents to be demolished PDF Print E-mail
Written by HAROLD BROWN Sentinel City Editor   
Saturday, 21 July 2012 07:58
Pop_Culture_rotator
Bowling Green State University confirmed Friday it is seeking bids to demolish a house in which four of its 11 presidents have resided.
Located at 838 E. Wooster Street just west of South College Drive, the structure was originally a kit home from Montgomery Ward, built in 1930 and renovated in 1950.
The house has served as the home of BGSU's Department of Popular Culture since the 1970s.
In late May the university demolished two structures directly west of the 838 address.
"I can confirm we are planning on demolishing the building," BGSU spokesperson David Kielmeyer said Friday afternoon. "It is in poor condition and would require a substantial investment to bring it up to being minimally acceptable."
He said the site, along with the adjacent properties where the buildings were demolished in May, is "one of the sites being considered for a new student health center." He declined to name other sites being considered.
The university announced earlier this month it was in discussions with Wood County Hospital to operate a new health center within the next two years. The present University Health Center is located on Ridge Street at Willard Drive.
Kielmeyer said Popular Culture will be moved to Shatzel Hall, where it will join the other departments that make up the School of Cultural and Critical Studies.  That move could happen in the next two weeks.
"We hope to move fairly quickly on the demolition and have it done before the start of classes (Aug. 20)," Kielmeyer said.
He said the university is proud of its heritage but officials "do not feel the house is particularly significant. There have been many other buildings sold or demolished over the years to meet the needs of students.
"The university is moving forward with plans to preserve and renovate University, Hanna and Moseley halls."  Kielmeyer said there is no timetable for those renovations but public and private funding are key to those projects moving forward.
Already on the demolition list for this fall are the remaining structures of the former H.J. Heinz factory at Ridge and Enterprise streets. That demolition will cost $135,000. The former United Christian Fellowship complex at Ridge and Thurstin was demolished in recent weeks.
Dr. Roy Offenhauer, Dr. Frank J. Prout, Dr. Ralph W. McDonald and Dr. Ralph G. Harshman lived in the home at 838 E. Wooster during their terms as president between 1937 and 1963.
After Harshman moved out, the home became the BGSU Alumni Center and then the Popular Culture offices. The Alumni Center relocated to the Mileti Alumni Center on Mercer Road in the 1970s.
The first presidential home was at 725 E. Wooster St., an 1880 two-story frame farmhouse. The then newly-founded Bowling Green Normal College purchased the home from the Wooster family, early settlers in Wood County, in 1914. First president Homer Williams lived there until 1939.
According to a brochure titled "Presidential Residences," which the university published in 2009, the first residence was later used as to house women students, as the counseling center, the Faculty Club and Delta Sigma Theta sorority. The home was demolished in 1973 to make way for the parking lot and access south of McFall Center.
When William T. Jerome III was named president the university acquired an existing home at 625 Hillcrest Drive in the Westgate subdivision. Dr. Hollis A. Moore Jr., Dr. Paul J. Olscamp, and Dr. Sidney Ribeau were later residents. Ribeau moved into a private residence from 2002 to 2005 and later became the first president to reside in University House at 700 S. Wintergarden Road.
University House was purchased by Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc., and given to BGSU as a residence for the president.
Dr. Carol A. Cartwright lived in the home during her time at BGSU and it is now occupied by the university's 11th president, Dr. Mary Ellen Mazey.
 

Comments  

 
# 2012-07-21 10:39
Too bad that this can't be saved. Progress! Tear down the sturdy and up with the cheap.

This house is probably sturdier and made better than any of the new buildings that will be constructed on it's site.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-21 11:21
This is a real disgrace, tearing down a beloved historic building with almost no warning, no chance for the community to express its outrage and dissent. A sad day for the history of BGSU and Popular Culture studies.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-21 15:30
Wonderful o see that BGSU is making all this new facilities for the students. Now BGSU will be more competitive with other Ohio universities.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-21 17:08
Soon, there isn't going to be anything left of the BG that I remember from growing up here. Seems like the city is "demolish" crazy these days. 1st the old Jr Hi, next the Central Administration building, now this beautiful structure. What's next?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-22 16:32
I agree with betty boop about all BG being in a demolish craze recently. Wondering why this latest site has popped up so quickly and why it is to be completed so quickly?? Something's afoot; it surely has nothing to do with students returning soon (nothing else is so pressing when students return; ie,street widening and closures).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-22 18:00
Proof that BGSU, particularly the current president, are not interested in building the BGSU community. This is why BGSU will never be competitive with other state universities: because it refuses to embrace what makes it special in favor of achieving short term strategic goals:

"Dear Students, Faculty and Staff:

As we move forward with implementing the campus master plan, there are some additional changes taking place over the summer. The offices of the Department of Popular Culture will be moving to Shatzel Hall for the start of the academic year to bring the departments that make up the School of Cultural and Critical Studies together in one facility. We’re excited about the academic collaborations this will help foster.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-22 18:01
"Popular Culture’s current home, the building at the corner of E. Wooster and South College Drive, will be demolished. I understand the nostalgic feelings some have for the building, since it once was the home of BGSU presidents. However, the building is in very poor condition and it is simply no longer cost effective to bring it up to minimally acceptable standards. While I would have preferred to let you know about this myself, many of you may have seen the announcement in the Sentinel-Tribune on Saturday."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-22 18:01
"Throughout BGSU’s history, presidential homes have been demolished or sold to meet the evolving strategic needs of the University. That is what is being done here. The location is one of the sites being considered for a new student health center. It is currently the preferred choice for safety reasons. With two crosswalks and a stoplight at this intersection, our students can reach the center safely and conveniently."
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-22 18:01
"I am hopeful that the demolition can be completed before the start of the fall semester to minimize the disruption for the University community.

These changes create some exciting new opportunities for our faculty and students. Provost Rogers and I will keep you updated as we move forward.

Regards,

Mary Ellen Mazey, Ph.D.
President"
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-23 00:24
Regarding: " . . .officials 'do not feel the house is particularly significant.'"
Let's consider that the discipline of Popular Culture was founded at BGSU. This is a distinguishing feature of the University, and a rarity in academia. The importance of the House goes beyond the functionality of the building -- the POPC House acts as a powerful visual representation of the department. It may as well be a logo.
From a marketing point of view, there is major appeal in showcasing the building as a historic landmark. By preserving this history, you would be reiterating the importance of the program and discipline on the world stage. Preservation would elevate one of BGSU’s major contributions to academics.
This little brick house is definitely significant. I urge BGSU officials to reconsider demolition.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-23 07:13
While BGSU was certainly central in pioneering and launching Popular Culture Studies as a serious academic discipline, and has been recognized for doing so across North America and elsewhere, the university culture even locally has shown a remarkable ambivalence to the department. You still get people, even colleagues, who deride the discipline without reading any of the work, because they have been misled by irresponsible claims, often from outsiders, about the nature of academic work in the humanities. When Ray Browne, founder of the program, died, members of the department were frustrated that the university itself did not call more attention to the achievements. So, it isn't surprising that they wipe away the building in the silence of summer.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-23 09:32
Look at all the beautiful buildings and houses in Ann Arbor. Once this is torn down it is gone forever and no one builds like this anymore. Today's structures are bland and built cheap, not to be notable in the future. I'd gladly take the home and pay to restore it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-23 16:06
I'm confused by something. Mazey's letter says that Popular Culture is moving as part of the new School of Cultural and Critical Studies, which was created over a year ago, and has had a director since early this year. So the PopC faculty must have known they were moving for months, at least, right? How could they possibly not have known until last week? Surely the university didn't tell faculty they had two weeks to pack their offices during the summer when they aren't even on contract and may not even be in BG. Something doesn't add up--either the PopC faculty aren't being honest about when they were told about the move, or the administration REALLY screwed this thing up, even setting aside the demolishing of the building!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-23 22:25
Sadly, from what I heard, the PopC faculty was told about the physical move and building demolition only a couple weeks ago. Some of the faculty are out of town for the summer. The administrative plans were known, but the physical move into Shatzel was also a new development.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 10:49
The faculty and staff in the department were notified that they would be moving last week. We were notified that the building would be demolished the next day. Everyone was aware that we were acting as part of the school and that a move may occur, but the when was always up in the air.
"Surely the university didn't tell faculty they had two weeks to pack their offices during the summer when they aren't even on contract and may not even be in BG."
This is EXACTLY what happened. Ask Environmental Sciences, whose offices we're being moved in to. They were also notified last week that they had to move out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 13:11
The fact is that BG would be another one stop light town in NW Ohio if it wasn't for BGSU. This university pumps millions of dollars into our community and keeps our economy stable. I do not work for BGSU, but I do thank them that I have a job in BG. If not for their presence, many of us could not support our families.
If they want to tear down a department store kit house, SO WHAT. They built it. Remember .... A home is not the physcial building you live in but the memories built in a place with loved ones.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 18:49
Actually, they didn't build it. It was built by a family in the town. It is a part of our town's history and an artifact of both depression era American and the university's history. If we destroy our past there is no hope for our future.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 14:28
With all the reconstruction going on in BG and environs I am astonished that this city and university are exempt from mandates requiring access for handicapped. Apparently the entire city plus BGSU were "Grandfathered." What a stupendous joke. Keep on demolishing....and sooner or later you will all be wondering how on earth you came to this fix?????
And by all means do NOT allow physical disabilities to EVER visit you....EVER.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 15:39
If the university is, indeed, serious about tearing it down (an idea that is deplorable), it seems they should allow for an open house to allow the public inside to see the craftsmanship of one of these unique homes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-27 09:51
They had pictures of it on Channel 11 news. The inside has been gutted and remodeled over the years. Inside the rooms are sterile looking with plain white drywall. Nothing fancy at all. I have no idea what it originally looked like.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 16:15
For those that don't want the building to be torn down, it's a pretty simple solution. Give the University $1.5 million dollars to cover the cost of renovating the place and bringing it up to current codes and standards.

All you gotta' do is put your $$$ where you mouth is.

I'm sorry to see it go, but it wasn't the first house of a University president.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-24 18:55
Where does your $1.5 million figure come from? Given adequate time I am sure that we could come up with the donations necessary to renovate the house. Also, while it may not be the first house of the president, it was the home for the ground-breaking and world renown department of Popular Culture, a program that actually brings a significant amount of prestige to BGSU. Saving the heritage of what makes BGSU unique is important, and being the home and historical cornerstone of popular culture studies in the United States is both unique and very significant.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 10:30
The buildings the University has slated for demolition over the coming years, it would horrify alumni and the community. Universities evolve over time. Old buildings come down, new ones rise. There are valid arguments for replacing or simply taking down some buildings. Others, I have to question the need. Not from a dollars and sense standpoint alone, but as an alum, community member. BGSU did not spend enough to keep many buildings in a good condition over the past thirty years. This has made it easy for some to justify replacement using standard rationale. There should be more than simply cold numbers involved in this process. Bond costs are at record lows, this is a unique window of time for BGSU to get a lot of work done. Could we not see more thought given to doing more preservation and innovative renovations?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-25 22:33
Gee... do I *have* to remind folks that the BGSU Foundation spent *$700,000* to purchase and renovate the new palace out on Wintergarden Road?

Why was spending nearly three-quarters of a million dollars on a new home for the president more important than keeping up the maintenance on existing buildings?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-26 09:33
Actually the total costs were over 1.3 million for the house, land, and renovations. A proper presidents mansion, was something the University had never had. It is being used rather frequently. I can't lump this into the same category as other expenditures, especially since the Foundation bought it, not the University.

I know they can't throw open the doors to public comment. Doing so in BG would lead to endless bickering. But I would like to see more signs of sensitivity to heritage. They came across too ham-handed this time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-26 09:00
This was probably kept hush hush so that pulblic wouldn't have time to object in any type of organized fashion, they could just go ahead and get it done quickly without to much fuss. When the university wants to build a new building nothing is going to get in their way. When they wanted East Hall built they said it was needed because South Hall was in such bad shape it need to tore down. Guess what South Hall is still standing, guess it wasn't so bad after all
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-07-27 11:03
Exactly.

The architects on campus talk about tearing the entire south-west corner of campus down, to "open" the campus up. Yet the only things it is opened too, are train noise and fire engines. Yet South Hall, which is a dilapidated ADA liability and eyesore, sits jammed tightly against McFall and Hann halls. It may have "good bones" but I see zero reason why keeping it over Founders, makes any sense. If anything, eliminating South Hall opens a view of the majestic founding buildings and Union. It also adds room for modest parking that Admissions desperately needs.

The architects noted they went many years without much to do, and were happy to be able to get "so much" done. I now wonder if they aren't go overboard. Project-drunk, if you will.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Swamp fest gets the blues
05/20/2013 | DAVID DUPONT Sentinel Arts & Entertainment Editor
article thumbnail

Guitarist Elvin Bishop, who helped give white kids the blues in the 1960s, will be one [ ... ]


Miller an advocate for those in need
05/20/2013 | Sentinel-Tribune
article thumbnail

David C. Miller For more than three decades, David C. Miller was the voice of the [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles
Sentinel-Tribune Copyright 2010