2012YearPhotos

Efforts fail to save pop culture house PDF Print E-mail
Written by HAROLD BROWN Sentinel City Editor   
Wednesday, 01 August 2012 10:00
Pop_Culture_House_protest-rotator
Raymond Schuck, middle, Professor of Communication, at BGSU, along with other protestors in front of the Pop Culture House. (Photo: J.D. Pooley/Sentinel-Tribune)
Upwards of 60 people gathered Tuesday evening in the latest effort to get Bowling Green State University officials to halt demolition plans for the “Pop Culture House” at 838 E. Wooster St.
The effort failed.
“At this point the university plans to proceed as planned,” BGSU spokesperson Dave Kielmeyer said this morning.
He said there is no definite date for demolition to begin but sometime the week of Aug. 13 seems likely. Demolition is expected to cost $25,000 to $30,000.
The group ranged in age from children to senior citizens, many carrying signs and chanting “Save this house.” One sign encouraged passing motorists to honk their horns in support of the cause. Many motorists obliged.
Built as a private residence by Virgil Taylor in the early 1930s, BGSU used the house as a home for four presidents from 1937 to 1963. The house was then used by the BGSU Alumni Association, before being turned into the headquarters for the university’s now internationally known Popular Culture Department.
Erin Holmberg, whose late father taught in the department in the 1980s and 1990s, said the planned demolition has attracted the attention of preservationists, along with local residents, alumni and students. “If 1,800 people are asking me not to do something, I would give (it) careful consideration, especially with the number of alumni involved,” Holmberg said. She was referring to an online petition to get the university to reconsider or at least provide time to arrange to have the structure moved.
She took issue with the university’s desire to get the structure out of the way before classes start in late August “so as not to disrupt classes.”
Holmberg said several groups dedicated to preserving kit homes across the United States have gotten involved. One kit home expert, Mary Thornton, has written several blogs and done a lot of research on the background of the home, she said. The research indicates the kit home is modeled after a Sears design but was manufactured by Montgomery Ward, at the request of Taylor.
A 1932 Bowling Green city directory lists Taylor as residing at 838 E. Wooster St. and his occupation as advertising director of the Sentinel-Tribune.
In her blog Thornton writes that Taylor lost the home in foreclosure a few years later to Montgomery Ward and that BGSU later became the owner.
The university announced plans to demolish the structure about two weeks ago. The Popular Culture Department is in the process of being relocated to Shatzel Hall, a move which has been planned for a period of time.
Michael Wiatrowski, a graduate assistant intern in popular culture planning to graduate Saturday, said he has been amazed at how the cause has attracted attention. “People all over the country have weighed in on helping to save our town’s heritage. I thought it might be a little story but it has turned into a big thing.” Wiatrowski doesn’t believe they have been able to change the administration’s mind. He plans to stay in BG and work on an master of business administration degree.
BGSU officials have said the site is being considered as a location for a new health center. The lot, along with two adjacent lots cleared of buildings earlier this summer are the likely location for the center.
Although there were no uniformed officers were on the demonstration site Tuesday, the event was observed by BGSU Police in an unmarked car in a shady parking space in a lot across Wooster Street near Hanna Hall.

Last Updated on Thursday, 02 August 2012 09:28
 

Comments  

 
# 2012-08-01 11:25
Sad, really, the university cares so little for history, though scant the history may be. Oh well. Maybe they'll build a new Arby's.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 11:53
They own it, they can do whatever they want.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 12:10
It was a done deal from the beginning. The University owned the property, they should be able to do with it what they want. It was outdated, and now the IMPORTANT contents will be more protected, have more room to grow and be safer for the staff that works there. A new Campus Health Center is badly needed and this should be the priority for the students that attend BGSU now !!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 12:30
DUH!
The University gets what the University wants. It's like the movie Animal House, but in reverse.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 13:15
This is so short sighted by BGSU and Rodney Rogers. BTW, the health center will not be located there, look at the BGSU Master Plan. The plan is to clear E Wooster to open it up for more green space as you enter BGSU from 75. That's fine, but you don't have to tear down a piece of Local History, it can add to the view!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 16:47
check your sources, the new health center, which is going to be ran by wood county hospital, is 99.9% likely to be built there. The building is in awful condition and is not worth renovating
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 14:44
I'm a little confused. Does the Pop Culture department think this is a symptom of a wider desire to attack the department? The University owns the house, obviously, and like the others along Wooster, it will tear it down if it wants. In my view, it is more a question of the need to tear it down. Especially if the health center isn't going to be built there, why rush? (unless they fear the students getting involved.)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 16:17
Regarding the university having the right to do what they want with their buildings: I agree. The university, however, is not simply comprised of administrators. It is an institution made up of students, faculty and staff, who work together towards a shared vision. Eliminating historical buildings on campus without heeding the input of students, faculty and staff is akin to having your house torn down by the bank that owns your mortgage while you're still living in it.
University administrators are supposed to be the stewards of the institution, who work with the community to achieve the mission of the school. They are not supposed to be despotic rulers who issue decrees and wipe out institutional memory to further their on selfish career agendas.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 17:16
If a new health center is built where the house now stands, what will happen to the current health center building? Anybody said yet?

It would be nice if they could at least relocate the house and preserve it elsewhere, if they really need the land for another project.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-02 09:37
I'm sure the University is loath to do that, because they don't want to be stuck with people wanting them to do the same thing with Old Greek Row. Those units are set to be torn down at some point, and surely we'll have some people saying they shouldn't be.

Ultimately it is not even the loss of this house that worries me. It is the longer term cycle of tearing seemingly everything down.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-01 22:14
Like I said, maybe they'll build a nice Arby's. Or put a Starbucks in the health center. Good-bye, funky little house on the hill, hello, parking-lot.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-02 07:30
I'd bet they'd give the house away to anyone who could demonstrate that they have the finances to move it in a timely manner. Perhaps we should start getting donations and get the home moved. Where should it go?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-02 08:03
Quoting bob:
The building is in awful condition and is not worth renovating

This line of reasoning never ceases to amaze. Property entrusted to a public institution is declared "awful condition" and a new one must be awarded to the same care takers. To top it off no inquiry is made into why the building wasn't maintained or what happened to the money allocated for it's up keep.

Another green space? Where do you people think you are, New York city? We have green spaces everywhere.

Can't see all the green spaces because of all the grass and trees in town, SURROUNDED by corn fields 5 minutes in any direction. :)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-08-03 08:06
The maintenance issue really irks me too. They stop taking care of buildings because they want a new one. There is no oversight on what is being taken care of and what is not.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Swamp fest gets the blues
05/20/2013 | DAVID DUPONT Sentinel Arts & Entertainment Editor
article thumbnail

Guitarist Elvin Bishop, who helped give white kids the blues in the 1960s, will be one [ ... ]


Miller an advocate for those in need
05/20/2013 | Sentinel-Tribune
article thumbnail

David C. Miller For more than three decades, David C. Miller was the voice of the [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles
Sentinel-Tribune Copyright 2010