2012YearPhotos

BG youths charged for racial graffiti PDF Print E-mail
Written by BILL RYAN Sentinel Staff Writer   
Thursday, 13 December 2012 10:40
CourtHouse_rotator
Four Bowling Green juveniles cases are scheduled to be heard in mid-January for actions in October, including two charged with a racial charge for graffiti placed on the driveway of Bowling Green State University head basketball coach Louis Orr.
According to Tim Atkins, an assistant prosecutor for Wood County in the juvenile division, two of the four boys were responsible for a swastika and the words "white power" written in chalk on the driveway of the African American coach's driveway.
They are both facing charges of criminal mischief and ethnic intimidation.
The other two individuals were believed to be present when that was done, but did not write on the driveway. Those two are facing only criminal mischief charges.
All four are students at Bowling Green High School, and range in age from 15-17.
Atkins said other property in the area had chalk markings as well in addition to having pumpkins smashed in a typical youth prank spree prior to Halloween.
"They were all in the same general location, but the incidents were separate and distinct, so two of the boys were not charged with the racial charge," Atkins said. "Had it not been their use of a swastika and 'white power,' people would have likely just took a hose and washed it all off and there would be no charges."
The assistant prosecutor added, "It was a very poor choice of imagery and words. This is not something you expect in Bowling Green."
He said all of the cases will be heard in juvenile court with the next proceedings scheduled for mid-January for all. Some of the defendants have been arraigned.
Atkins said that it does not appear the defendants were targeting the coach.
"They knew an African American lived there, but did not know that it was the coach's home," he said noting their familiarity with Orr's nephew, a sophomore who also lives at the Orr residence. "It wasn't done maliciously."
Atkins also referenced another incident near the time of the graffiti involving a busted watermelon and other verbiage at a different location.
"There is no indication they are connected," he said.
He indicated all of the defendants realized it was a "very poor choice of words" and he does not expect any further instances from these students.
 

Comments  

 
# 2012-12-13 15:03
This WAS malicious.

Also, the PARENTS need to be re-educated here. That is where the full accountability lies.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-14 10:55
Quoting Brian:
This WAS malicious.

Why, because you say so? What do you know about it that others do not? Were you there, a witness? Maybe you have information that would help the prosecution. You should step forward and testify in court.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-14 23:13
Conneaut, are you one of those people who only sees racism in people who point out the racism of others?

How on earth is the use of the phrase "white power" or of a swastika not malicious? Explain that.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 13:57
Conneaut, you racist, I challenge you to tell me HOW is "White Power" and a swastika on an African American's home NOT malicious?

You make me sick defending such MALICIOUS racists.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-13 17:22
I agree with you, Brian. I don't understand why every article on this is written or quoted to make light of the issue. I also agree that this behavior was learned at home. The boys and their parents should be ashamed of themselves. I hope those away from BG understand that this behavior is not representative of our town.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-13 19:27
I think Tim Akin needs to attend a session on race relations. This is malicious and sounds like a cover up for someone with influence in town is pushing for a slap on the hand.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-14 10:52
A "cover up." That's why it has been all over the Sentinel-Tribune, and the Blade, and ESPN. Yeah, a cover-up, that's it.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-14 12:05
These kids were 15 to 17 years of age. Their brains are not fully developed. Martin Luther King day will be here in January, sentence them to watching the old civil rights news clips from the early 1960's and then test them on what they watched.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 13:59
How about the racist parents who raised them?

If these precious juveniles were so underdeveloped, then who the he** gave them these racist ideas?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-17 13:13
Quoting oldham:
These kids were 15 to 17 years of age. Their brains are not fully developed. Martin Luther King day will be here in January, sentence them to watching the old civil rights news clips from the early 1960's and then test them on what they watched.

~Watching old news clips wouldn't help them; they need to be assigned some kind of community service that would help them identify with others. Helping and serving create love and that's what these boys are missing.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-15 12:55
I think people really are making a bigger deal of this than necessary. Yes it was horrible decision, and the kids obviously did something stupid. But you can't blame the parents on this, we all know that when kids get together they conjure up some stupid ideas and definately make poor choices. I don't believe they did it with any malicious intent, if that were the case i'm sure they could have come up with something much more harmful than writing with chalk. Obviously the kids need to be held responsible but leave the parenting skills out of it. Do you blame your parents for every stupid thing you did as a teenager??
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 08:01
Kids or adults, when is the phrase "white power" or the swastika anything but malicious? And where did the kids learn the meaning of these phrases or the significance of chalking them on the property of an African-American neighbor? When "children" are coddled for sociopathic self-expression, is it any wonder when they sometimes grow up to be sociopathic adults?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 14:01
Racism is LEARNED behavior. Parents give their ideology to their children.

This really IS a big deal if the BG community is going to confront the skeletons in it's racist closet.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 18:18
Racism is learned at home. I'm not a racist, and neitherare my kids. Get it?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-16 20:07
This action was very malicious and this type of behavior makes me sick to my stomach. The parents should be sentenced in court also; they are responsible for the actions of their kids. This is a HATE crime; in all reality those kids are old enough to be sentenced in "real" court as an adult. There is no room in society for this behavior, no excuses for this behavior, this is pure hate and most likely taught at home.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-17 09:46
@Brian, @ Christopher, @ Amanda, @ Dave

Yes racism is learned at home, but the racial implications of phrases like "White power" and imagery like the swaskitka are ubiquitous. As a result it is difficult to defend the assumption that these teenagers learned the impact of these devices at home. Nor is it appropriate to assume that the insensitivity or hate displayed is a result of poor parenting. Teenagers do stupid, insensitive, and hateful things, and they should be held responsible for those actions. But let's not assume there is an underlying ideological motivation. Maybe there is; maybe there is not.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-17 17:53
The notion that causes are everywhere and hence that no cause can be specified and that there is in effect no one to blame is slippery and naïve. And unrealistic. It remains the parents' responsibility to educate their children that engaging in this kind of behavior is no laughing matter, that using race-baiting and neo-Nazi language is no reflection of their values. It is sociopathic, and ultimately the parents' responsibility as long as they are minors.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-18 10:03
Fair enough, but my point was not that no one is to blame because we can't specify a cause. My point was that we should not speculate about causes.
We are-after all-making the assumption that these teens have parents, and that those parents are capable (having not suffered abuse themselves or become addled with addictions), and that they have time to invest in their children (instead of having their days eaten away by the struggles of poverty). My point was not to absolve the teens or the parents; my point is that we should not assume the roots of values. Maybe they learned these values at home; maybe they didn't.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-18 14:16
Fair enough. But the results are malicious behavior, and a very troubling embrace of values that are antithetical to civilized society, wherever they were learned. I am perhaps more troubled by those who are trying to let the kids off the hook than the fact that they did this, and the assistant prosecutor's use of the phrase "not malicious" is deeply troubling.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-18 10:10
The young men deliberately chose to spend an evening vandalizing, destroying property, and defacing with carefully chosen symbols of hate. Neo-Nazi language and a Nazi symbol used against race/ethnic and religious groups is violent imagery intended to terrify. I haven't a clue why the assistant prosecutor says that it's not malicious since the young men didn't know that a friend lived in that home. Using racial/ethnic and religious hate imagery against strangers isn't malicious? At any rate, the young men seem lucky because Mr. Atkins apparently doesn't feel that they were malicious nor criminal in their "very poor choice of words." Some communities consider those "poor choice of words" to be defamatory hate speech. The prosecutors' office should show greater concern for race/ethnic and religious minorities.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-19 15:21
I do not think you people realize the kids are not actually racists. Have you been in the high school environment, kids throw around racial slurs as though they are complete jokes. Was this completely inappropriate yes! Should they be punished, yes! However, I would like to point at that this was done as a joke and did not stem from true racial tensions. Kids these days throw around the 'N' word and Nazi jokes like is nothing. I do not think half of them really even know what they are saying.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# 2012-12-19 23:30
Oh my Roll along, you have truly lost touch with reality. Just because kids say racial jokes and slurs around in school they are racist. Do you know what racism is? It is, just that, racial jokes and slurs. This whole town's opinions and actions concerning this are totally embarrassing. People in this town continue to see the world though rose colored glasses. If these kids don’t know what they are saying then it is defiantly time to teach them right from wrong and make an example of them.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

NOTE: Comments are moderated. Comments have a 800 character limit! Comments are not posted until reviewed by Sentinel staff. Depending on the time of day you submit comments there may be a delay in posting to the website. If you see a comment that you think needs our attention, please e-mail hbrown@sentinel-tribune.com.


Front Page Stories

Park position is natural fit
05/25/2013 | PETER KUEBECK | Sentinel Staff Writer
article thumbnail

Jim Witter, WC Park District Naturlist. (Photo: J.D. Pooley/Sentinel-Tribune)
PER [ ... ]


Honor Flight treats former Army cook
05/25/2013 | PETER KUEBECK | Sentinel Staff Writer
article thumbnail

Honor Flight recipient Leroy Chamberlain is seen in his home in Bowling Green, Ohio on M [ ... ]


Other Front Page Articles
Sentinel-Tribune Copyright 2010